Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:61749) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SNjoO-0000IL-MM; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 04:58:13 -0700 Received: by dado14 with SMTP id o14sf642277dad.16 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 04:58:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Lx8fJhhsuTWdENgNP+7eaAw4BA3C7U30Lgm8yJ3jpGY=; b=t7jzyAV9yEjykl05BVz+8K9JA9N8tWZD/LJZR2qxY7pm5MrzP0eABolJ/3xfjJHE4D Y0DMJsho1fL/gYWZbAIfqRKU0QL+1j9pZczrB0lO8be9smE9EX+TGRStG6C9CTwO2z1p ZSxsuP2e2ySVnXpSUlLMRBqn/n1rBN/Gf7px8= Received: by 10.236.182.129 with SMTP id o1mr329800yhm.18.1335525766274; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 04:22:46 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.236.84.232 with SMTP id s68ls2383720yhe.5.gmail; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 04:22:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.72.232 with SMTP id t68mr324992yhd.12.1335525765707; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 04:22:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 04:22:44 -0700 (PDT) From: ianek To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-ID: <26391225.3065.1335525764885.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynei5> In-Reply-To: <4875290.11.1335523235974.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbep19> References: <4875290.11.1335523235974.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbep19> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Linked sumti in the main bridi MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: janek37@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of janek37@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=janek37@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3064_23959039.1335525764884" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 3253 ------=_Part_3064_23959039.1335525764884 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Oh, I've realized that such assumption can only be found in gleki's new rafsi proposal (eg. jve = "be fe lo") and it wasn't explicitly stated. Anyway, I'd like to know how do we treat such selbri. Maybe {ko'a broda be ko'e ko'i} is equivalent to {ko'a broda ko'e fe ko'i}? The latter, as far as I understand, is an awful way to say {ko'a broda ko'e e ko'i} (or maybe {ko'a broda ko'e ju'e ko'i}? I can't say I understand {ju'e} and I don't see it in CLL). On Friday, April 27, 2012 12:40:35 PM UTC+2, ianek wrote: > > In a recent thread there seemed to be an assumption that {ko'a broda be > ko'e ko'i} means the same as {ko'a broda ko'e ko'i}, ie. linked sumti > eliminate the filled brivla places. Where is the source of this fact? I > looked into http://dag.github.com/cll/5/7/ and didn't find it. > > mu'o mi'e ianek > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/85hRtolT8ToJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. ------=_Part_3064_23959039.1335525764884 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Oh, I've realized that such assumption can only be found in gleki's new raf= si proposal (eg. jve =3D "be fe lo") and it wasn't explicitly stated.
A= nyway, I'd like to know how do we treat such selbri. Maybe {ko'a broda be k= o'e ko'i} is equivalent to {ko'a broda ko'e fe ko'i}? The latter, as far as= I understand, is an awful way to say {ko'a broda ko'e e ko'i} (or maybe {k= o'a broda ko'e ju'e ko'i}? I can't say I understand {ju'e} and I don't see = it in CLL).

On Friday, April 27, 2012 12:40:35 PM UTC+2, ianek wrote= :
In a recent thread there seem= ed to be an assumption that {ko'a broda be ko'e ko'i} means the same as {ko= 'a broda ko'e ko'i}, ie. linked sumti eliminate the filled brivla places. W= here is the source of this fact? I looked into http://dag.github.com/cll/5/7/ and did= n't find it.

mu'o mi'e ianek

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/l= ojban-beginners/-/85hRtolT8ToJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_3064_23959039.1335525764884--