Received: from mail-qa0-f56.google.com ([209.85.216.56]:61860) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SVGRT-0002pi-EI; Thu, 17 May 2012 23:13:39 -0700 Received: by qauh8 with SMTP id h8sf2562881qau.1 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 23:13:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rC7zmPa50SshLmvVaT73qAwdtJO7MGVrGHZtIfUqARk=; b=53k4fBS3FoFnKhhC9X2ZcWCN9iZpCLFRAJ1Dc/XhFEPgKbGPQ/jgUrXjJgpPut0Cfn cGIi1gd3BfbzLJuE/A8BNOYv/WAn0MzWIvOkJrEP8pzzlUj/Jp6Z1N9yp6CItKiaoAL6 Pc+LkBNBnKLZVpE1TEPePZpAqcnDxStJMAaaU= Received: by 10.52.20.51 with SMTP id k19mr452913vde.8.1337321608353; Thu, 17 May 2012 23:13:28 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.23.142 with SMTP id m14ls633308vdf.1.gmail; Thu, 17 May 2012 23:13:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.68.134 with SMTP id w6mr461937vdt.6.1337321607656; Thu, 17 May 2012 23:13:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by n16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 23:13:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 23:13:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3639382.1486.1337213982012.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcpi6> <201205162355.05615.phma@phma.optus.nu> <7734dfcb-e9b8-4c85-9f19-8d04a19d1f8f@8g2000vbu.googlegroups.com> <3da91443-5011-46d3-a596-82f7d96fe675@ec4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <4cd01729-b95c-4a6a-ba94-d71c11cff0c9@n16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/536.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/19.0.1084.46 Safari/536.5,gzip(gfe) Message-ID: Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: What can you do with Lojban that you can't do with English? From: ianek To: Lojban Beginners X-Original-Sender: janek37@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of janek37@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=janek37@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 2240 On 17 Maj, 23:38, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:17 PM, ianek wrote: > > > Are there many other simple Lojban constructs which meanings are > > unspecified? I'd say that tanru logical connectives are pretty base > > thing, > > The main problem with tanru logical connnectives is what can it mean > to connect two predicates with different place structures. The usual > assumption is that the x1 of "broda je brode" has to be something that > satisfies both the x1 of broda and the x1 of brode. But what about the > x2? Does it have to satisfy both the x2 of broda and the x2 of brode? > If so, does something like "ko'a ko'e sutra je bajra" make any sense > at all? > > >unlike some obscure mekso issues, or "what if a sentence has > > multiple prenexes". > > I'm not aware of any issues with multiple prenexes, it's just the same > as one single longer prenex. Yes, it was also an example of a rarely-to-never used construct, so any issues there would be quite artificial (compared to tanru connectives). > > Also, I don't really understand how jo'u works in general, in CLL I've > > seen only one example. Does {mi jo'u do bevri lo pipno} mean that each > > of us carries a piano individually, but we both carry the same piano? > > I take "jo'u" as the connective corresponding to "lo", just like "joi" > corresponds to "loi" and "ce" corresponds to "lo'i". So "mi jo'u do > bevri lo pipno" is like "lo re prenu cu bevri lo pipno". So the example 14.10 from CLL 14.14 http://dag.github.com/cll/14/14/ "la djeimyz. jo'u la djordj. cu remei bruna" would correspond to "lo re nanmu cu remei bruna" and I don't see why it would work as suggested in that chapter. mu'o mi'e ianek > > The less I understand jo'u as a tanru connective... > > Tanru connectives are indeed weird. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.