Received: from mail-wg0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]:58538) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SoV5o-0003kB-Aj; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:42:46 -0700 Received: by wgbdt10 with SMTP id dt10sf8394157wgb.16 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:42:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=CRP9eES8jnDp2zF6tMj+AedR+xBrpSum+7PMVu99hBY=; b=fBdVW8Qucz2YNFSoZ4TbxzLqnz0Uld8G4nt15E+hBFPlRLB/GNMtlNdcJwGvZvQVOw HaKu08ZhyVWFNaNRN938efM8O73LGiQbheovIkxWLowviWCeSHAgvTy9GWxjyZpz18PM Yjq4zaJMJW46vTWKGnP7B+hVFWWhi48j0Ke0U= Received: by 10.204.153.214 with SMTP id l22mr335345bkw.3.1341906154753; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:42:34 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.130.131 with SMTP id t3ls1147024bks.9.gmail; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:42:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.152.23 with SMTP id e23mr3955334bkw.6.1341906153164; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:42:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.152.23 with SMTP id e23mr3955333bkw.6.1341906153146; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:42:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k7si17071136bks.2.2012.07.10.00.42.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:42:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.181; Received: by lbbgk8 with SMTP id gk8so5589379lbb.26 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:42:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.109.166 with SMTP id ht6mr43984085lab.46.1341906152706; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:42:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.46.36 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:42:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <0adc70ab-9070-49cd-8922-100e3da23ed5@googlegroups.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:42:32 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Wedding ring engraving From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.181 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54ee62c8dd39304c474df55 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 4990 --bcaec54ee62c8dd39304c474df55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Paul Predkiewicz < paul.predkiewicz@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's not especially generic at all, although each argument can refer > > to any entity actually called that. > > > Yeah, that is what i meant. I know {la} doesn't mean "the", but more > like "next-up: a name" > I was just trying to say that as it is the statement {la cipni cu > prami la mlatu} leaves alot of questions open... > On the other hand it seems i tend to forget the following, a wedding > ring engraved with > {la cipni cu ze'e prami la mlatu} > and another engraved with > {la mlatu cu ze'e prami la cipni} > pretty much adds a whole lot of context. so i guess even if only this > sentence fits inside the rings, it would still be selfdesprict, since > if you knew what a wedding ring is you could easily assume that the > wearer is the person who loves the loved one. > > But when written down on the internet, it doesn't sound like much. > > Oh and, if you use gismu as a name, to form a valid sentence, do you > need to put a full stop there {la cipni. cu prami}? Or is {la cipni cu > prami} fine too? Or is it even {la .cipni. cu prami}? > I can never accurately remember which are called cmene and which are called cmevla, but let's assume eg. {la mlatu} are the ones called cmevla. If I'm wrong, someone will correct me. Only cmene need to be surrounded by pauses. It is never wrong to put a pause where one is not needed, but cmevla have no need of them at all, however, that is why they need to be followed by ku/cu in some situations, whereas cmene never do. -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --bcaec54ee62c8dd39304c474df55 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Paul Predkiewi= cz <paul.predkiewicz@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's not especially generic at all, although eac= h argument can refer
> to any entity actually called that.


Yeah, that is what i meant. I know {la} doesn't mean "the&qu= ot;, but more
like "next-up: a name"
I was just trying to say that as it is the statement {la cipni cu
prami la mlatu} leaves alot of questions open...
On the other hand it seems i tend to forget the following, a wedding
ring engraved with
{la cipni cu ze'e prami la mlatu}
and another engraved with
{la mlatu cu ze'e prami la cipni}
pretty much adds a whole lot of context. so i guess even if only this=
sentence fits inside the rings, it would still be selfdesprict, since
if you knew what a wedding ring is you could easily assume that the
wearer is the person who loves the loved one.

But when written down on the internet, it doesn't sound like much.

Oh and, if you use gismu as a name, to form a valid sentence, do you
need to put a full stop there {la cipni. cu prami}? Or is {la cipni cu
prami} fine too? Or is it even {la .cipni. cu prami}?

I can never accurately remember which are called cmene an= d which are called cmevla, but let's assume eg. {la mlatu} are the ones= called cmevla. If I'm wrong, someone will correct me.

Only cmene need to be surrounded by pauses. It is never wrong to put a = pause where one is not needed, but cmevla have no need of them at all, howe= ver, that is why they need to be followed by ku/cu in some situations, wher= eas cmene never do.

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko c= mima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the = Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--bcaec54ee62c8dd39304c474df55--