Received: from mail-qa0-f56.google.com ([209.85.216.56]:51977) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SobFU-0000L1-3W; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:17:09 -0700 Received: by qaas11 with SMTP id s11sf280206qaa.1 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:17:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=7YmhtaKk/VmDzIihCzyr/CzPn2g6c8f8eEGLUIKRhGM=; b=ViS9Mdh3K7unEA78zg34kRTABzeVGTcIAGrO30ylgM/wevbd9Gc3ItrOxdJvnxOmWO OAOZa2nTQQr+VRBxcXKwwx2Uwsg77AKPLVstkTcUPC4PdlI4WsKuzFgLwf6aa4pW8B20 YzynReU2LqbB2lPWcd0at4koSRjwO0X71y34s= Received: by 10.224.207.66 with SMTP id fx2mr3563376qab.8.1341929821215; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:17:01 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.38.21 with SMTP id z21ls2093096qcd.2.gmail; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.33.148 with SMTP id h20mr38581251qad.3.1341929817858; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.33.148 with SMTP id h20mr38581249qad.3.1341929817830; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com (mail-qc0-f174.google.com [209.85.216.174]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z30si4705674qcd.3.2012.07.10.07.16.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of paul.predkiewicz@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.174; Received: by mail-qc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id o28so17967qcr.33 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.13.201 with SMTP id j9mr45043415oec.51.1341929817633; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:16:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.67.201 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:16:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <0adc70ab-9070-49cd-8922-100e3da23ed5@googlegroups.com> From: Paul Predkiewicz Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:16:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Wedding ring engraving To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: paul.predkiewicz@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of paul.predkiewicz@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=paul.predkiewicz@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 3098 Yay, my sister just wrote that she will try if {la cipni cu ze'e prami la mlatu} and {la cipni cu ze'e prami la mlatu} fit into the rings. The longer version wouldn't fit for sure. But considering it to be engraved into wedding rings, i'm pretty happy with these sentences now On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Paul Predkiewicz wrote: > hm i guess i messed up what i meant, i meant {nu'e} grabs {la mlatu} > and {do} grabs {nu'e} > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Michael Turniansky > wrote: >> No, no, it DOES only "touch" the "la mlatu" >> >> .i iu mi no'u la cipni ze'e prami do nu'e la mlatu -> >> [love] I, who is Bird, forever loves you, I promise Cat >> iu >> mi I (x1 of prami) >> no'u la cipni [ge'u] who is Bird >> [cu] ze'e forever >> prami loving >> do you (x2 of prami) >> nu'e I-promise >> la mlatu Cat (x2 of nu'e) >> >> The nu'e la mlatu together are free-floating, not tied to anything, much >> like .iu >> --gejyspa >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Paul Predkiewicz >> wrote: >>> >>> Ok i just read a bit about all the selma'o, didn't really know about >>> it much. i never really got into exploring cmavo, instead tried to >>> learn a bunch of gismu first. >>> My problem here was, and kinda still is, that i thought {nu'e} would >>> only touch the following {la mlatu} and not the preceding {do}. >>> But i guess {do}'s definition "identified by vocative" means exactly >>> this... >>> >>> cmavo are pretty much virgin soil for me.. >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Michael Turniansky >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Paul Predkiewicz >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Jacob Errington >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > .i iu mi no'u la cipni ze'e prami do nu'e la mlatu >>> >> > >>> >> > melrai :P >>> >> > >>> >> > mu'o mi'e la tsani >>> >> >>> >> That is indeed very cute :3 >>> >> i like the nu'e, but wouldnt la mlatu slip into the x3 of prami? Of >>> >> course if it had an x3, which it doesn't.. >>> >> >>> > No. Most people forget that "ne'u" is a COI, so it grabs the "la >>> > mlatu" >>> > --gejyspa >>> > >>> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Lojban Beginners" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.