Received: from mail-gg0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:44396) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SpQzg-0004Hn-P9; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:32:17 -0700 Received: by ggke5 with SMTP id e5sf3011014ggk.16 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:32:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=0s9F4iATe66rna+7+Xw0vetwdRNH86ciUtMt7ZYL+mM=; b=ag3/UpjzHli5NpVKfzC/2mO5nkTsfg+lSUWhiOWHmG8oOan0AijKzV9e8ddnSHeFxs hpqH5USF4qQZjSZtTLxiGSkC+4by4dz7dkmVZC/lCofb9OPqxczmI4thumsRpbaj/hsC +W26FDKZirJc5IhfHC31NiN05/ZFEfEcsQH4s= Received: by 10.52.94.147 with SMTP id dc19mr3537605vdb.17.1342128730364; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:32:10 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.230.193 with SMTP id jn1ls1466537vcb.8.gmail; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.33.1 with SMTP id n1mr44162163vdi.4.1342128729612; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.33.1 with SMTP id n1mr44162162vdi.4.1342128729602; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com (mail-vc0-f174.google.com [209.85.220.174]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y4si272856vds.2.2012.07.12.14.32.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.174; Received: by vcbf11 with SMTP id f11so1850621vcb.19 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.90.233 with SMTP id bz9mr22177329vdb.93.1342128729336; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:32:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.24.193 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:31:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4FFDFD65.5050507@plasmatix.com> From: Jacob Errington Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:31:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] lo nu pilno zo kakne ce'onai lo sucta To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 2857 On 12 July 2012 17:15, wrote: > But that one doesn't say who the talker is. It says "I can (event-of > unspecified-it talks)". Isn't that a problem? > Depends on who you ask, but the general consensus is that the x1 of kakne *must* find its way into the abstraction of kakne2. In fact, a previous discussion about the properties of kakne2 led me (and a handful of others) to believe that kakne2 should be a ka-abstraction, where the {ce'u} refers to the value of kakne1. {mi kakne lo ka [ce'u] tavla} "I can talk." mu'o mi'e la tsani > On Wednesday, 11 July 2012 23:25:41 UTC+1, selpa'i wrote: >> >> Am 11.07.2012 19:50, schrieb jammyatjammy@gmail.com: >> > le munvelski be zo kakne du la'e zoi gy x1 is able to do/be/capable of >> > doing/being x2 (event/state) under conditions x3 (event/state) gy .i >> > xu zoi gy being gy nibyti'i lo du'u zo kakne kakne lo selpli secau zo >> > nu to noi simsa nunpli fi tu'a le vi jufra toi >> > >> > The description of "kakne" is "x1 is able to do/be/capable of >> > doing/being x2 (event/state) under conditions x3 (event/state)". Does >> > "being" imply that "kakne" can be used without "nu" after it, and >> > instead using a simple sumti (as I did above). >> > >> > Probably a simpler example is {mi kakne lo tavla be fo la lojban.} - >> > "I can-be a talker in-language Lojban" .i xu di'u xagytadji lo nu >> > pilno zo kakne >> >> It says "do/be" because those two are the same thing in Lojban. There is >> no to be or to do. That is, there is no difference between "I am a man" >> {mi nanmu }and "I [do] walk" {mi cadzu}. It's always just an argument >> (sumti) filling a place of a predicate (selbri). You still need an >> abstraction for kakne. {mi kakne lo ka/nu tavla} means both "I can be a >> talker" and "I can talk". >> >> mu'o mi'e la selpa'i >> >> -- >> .i pau mi me ma .i pa mai ko mi jungau la'e di'u >> .i ba bo mi va'o lo nu nelci lo nu me ma kau cu barkla >> .i va'o lo nu na nelci cu denpa ti lo nu mi drata >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/o_YJVA9fUjMJ. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.