Received: from mail-qc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]:60531) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T1xoH-0008Rl-Tb; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 04:00:22 -0700 Received: by qcac11 with SMTP id c11sf2683111qca.16 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 04:00:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=blERJYg/Rt47jHXLYiURoRlweZ8V0jAdlofuL6dpgA8=; b=QVepLf6CH2Es2rj8YHgx1xJdCR8GQrv/RKWJnQozDY506M6/WvY85/iHR+lhytuVQ7 sXudK4l8R2Eqkea5JACq8nBp1cuujDl2ZcjBsYZBuMg3d4tUsErqSrVt2T4w31lPN/00 qUn/bxdYZOVGbfPdURGxWwQey7gKmHWG5Xy5A= Received: by 10.236.184.196 with SMTP id s44mr96849yhm.16.1345114810837; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 04:00:10 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.236.149.34 with SMTP id w22ls5237501yhj.8.gmail; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 04:00:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.79.40 with SMTP id h28mr393312yhe.48.1345114810169; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 04:00:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.79.40 with SMTP id h28mr393309yhe.48.1345114810157; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 04:00:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chausie ([2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id l23si1140912yhk.6.2012.08.16.04.00.09; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 04:00:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5; Received: from ip6-localhost (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E711FCD3 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:00:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Lojban Lujvo - My First Attempts Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:00:06 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <19ce0c7d-8f05-4633-9cd6-395bc0483b89@googlegroups.com> <201208150901.02848.phma@phma.optus.nu> <5239f640-3793-44ed-ac11-b702815f1115@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <5239f640-3793-44ed-ac11-b702815f1115@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201208160700.07145.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 2532 On Thursday 16 August 2012 04:49:02 cariar.jermanis. wrote: > Coi Pierre, > > I am a little surprised that no gismu for "scale" had been contrived during > the invention process. Well, I guess I will make do with "kapkarda." But > when I think about it, "kapkardamantyctimabru" would be a very long word to > use conventionally, so I think using a fi'uvla would be better here. > "Gurmabru" could also be used for the armadillo, which also rolls into a > ball. A similar problem occurs with "jesymabru", which could refer to a hedgehog (ernace), a porcupine (jesyratcu), or a spiny anteater (zalgosu). The armadillo is called "cakmabru". > On the frog life-stages, I feel that since the larvae of frogs and toads > are very distinct from their adult counterparts - while the larvae of > salamanders are not so much save for their gills and number of legs, > "cifpi'ebanfi," "ci'orpi'ebanfi," etc. for "tadpole," > "froglet/metamorphizing tadpole," etc. would remain fine if one wants to > refer specifically to frogs and toads. However, if one wants to refer to > amphibians in general, the terms you suggested aren't disagreeable either. > Lincro suggested "jbi(pi'e)banfi" if I wanted to express that a > metamorphizing tadpole is an "almost/near-frog." Perhaps I will use that to > describe an evolutionary ancestor of frogs. As for the axolotl, well: > > le aclotli. ci'orbanfi. > > Or what I hope to be correctly saying: > > "The axolotl remains young." I think what you mean is "lo .aclotli cu ci'orvi'o lo nu se jaurfepri", where "ci'orvi'o" means "neotenous" and I'm open to suggestions about this word. > On possible words for extinction, could the "jutmro" that you proposed be > placed like this: > > x1 is/is made extinct by x2 through/by means of x3. "morsi", and therefore "jutmro", don't have a place for the cause of death. You want "jutmro" or "jutycatra". > Also, if, for example, I wanted to say "the extinction of the dodo," would > I say: > > la jutmro. le dodo. You'd say "le nu lo cipnrdodo cu jutmrobi'o". "dodo" is a repeated pronoun; "le dodo" is ungrammatical. Pierre -- lo ponse be lo mruli po'o cu ga'ezga roda lo ka dinko -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.