Received: from mail-qc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]:55712)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban-beginners+bncCMLaiI6rCBC6jouBBRoEwmSWIg@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1SzCYZ-00059l-24; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 13:08:43 -0700
Received: by qcac11 with SMTP id c11sf1253896qca.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 13:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
         :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=rhNDN2kRGGwqcJYK/8cy4BUDymPiUPX4J6Gkh2hIpjk=;
        b=PQtvC6lEt2Zj0zey6KyqmKOxlJ7HcX+decOZiWm6g1ahkJmqWc0JdKSigvStA6b15r
         nmEMhtOZKUDCbNAji8a2UIzTLXzcM7NI/kcRcDizY2szaKE6XsqSX4k5kXEZXw4hubpP
         cIC/2l4pvxpCX3XApYn2ZJk5mjJfDaPKo8qMw=
Received: by 10.52.37.8 with SMTP id u8mr2360728vdj.18.1344456506930;
        Wed, 08 Aug 2012 13:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.52.36.237 with SMTP id t13ls1699189vdj.3.gmail; Wed, 08 Aug
 2012 13:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.34.9 with SMTP id v9mr2349129vdi.9.1344456506245; Wed, 08
 Aug 2012 13:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by w8g2000vbx.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 13:08:26
 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 13:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ8VDX-ZigM+_nw2ediVD261EndAjfMwTcmqvUcz4OY1QJaGA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a28dd25c-ef78-429c-ab90-6a66be0900b2@googlegroups.com>
 <201208062302.06087.phma@phma.optus.nu> <CAEimHHB7-8+P1BirssPe8UG=eJK=frFj_GBw44NQF==xyhRR0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <201208070002.10472.phma@phma.optus.nu> <790b043f-085d-479d-98ab-5dbe51bf04b6@j28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <CAMKwHj1GvOmPnPK9f4Y=7HUVs+NKCH-6D6pePo0qHoyZX+y0Qw@mail.gmail.com>
 <ac21022f-66a7-490d-a338-a8cdbe70dec4@r7g2000yqr.googlegroups.com>
 <CAMKwHj3O2W5P8=zVRDstpH=KVFVRAbmt-GYbmDGGqYteNY+fvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <5f3c1611-8497-46d7-bc2c-34cfead5d0c5@j11g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
 <CAMKwHj3eBpj3amVMQUmFDcHWkpPSN-wv76rTuEMkaFOkfQ0xaQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <50216ED9.5050608@plasmatix.com> <CAMKwHj0mzrJrvePf4YOOgUCHqV639N_2yWgz-pGaXKwCNWVPsw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHxnAmKAiEbp0NwXd3AU_wTKiPHKAXo82NW4b3SjdTM0B9DhTg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOQ8VDX-ZigM+_nw2ediVD261EndAjfMwTcmqvUcz4OY1QJaGA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML,
 like Gecko) Ubuntu/11.04 Chromium/18.0.1025.151 Chrome/18.0.1025.151 Safari/535.19,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <87c960f9-669f-4bae-92fd-aee758f0c87f@w8g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: sedu'u and ko
From: ianek <janek37@gmail.com>
To: Lojban Beginners <lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com>
X-Original-Sender: janek37@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain
 of janek37@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=janek37@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban-beginners.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban-beginners+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:lojban-beginners+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:googlegroups-manage+300742228892+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
Content-Length: 2531

Another argument: NU clauses, according to formal grammar, can be
joined with connectives. So {nu je du'u broda} is correct. On the
other hand {nu je se du'u broda} is not. Of course {se nu je du'u
broda} is perfectly grammatical (with undefined meaning), because {se}
acts on the abstraction.

mu'o mi'e ianek

On 8 Sie, 20:45, Jacob Errington <nicty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8 August 2012 07:20, Efrain Caro <betse...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Really? Then why do they ALL have place tags in their definition?
>
> > > du'u abstractor: predication/bridi abstractor; x1 is predication [bridi]
> > > expressed in sentence x2.
>
> > Jonathan, you are obviously a more knowledgeable person on matters of
> > Lojban than myself; so pardon me whether I'm asking a stupid question.
>
> > I want to ask why those definitions contain *[bridi]* in their
> > definitions. By themselves, I assume they don't. I must assume thus
> > that the definition refers to a complete abstraction and not the
> > abstractor by itself. How am I wrong? Does any abstractor form an
> > abstraction all by itself? If so, what {lo se du'u kei} would mean?
> > Does it mean {lo se du'u co'e kei}? Or is it illegal?
>
> > Please, explain.
>
> > mu'o mi'e betsemes
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Lojban Beginners" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
>
> NU produces a selbri and a selbri contains by definition a place structure.
> However, NU *by themselves* don't have a place structure. The selbri that
> they produce does. The distinction is subtle, but it does exist. Therefore,
> SE do not apply to NU proper. They apply to selbri (and connectives and
> tags).
>
> NU cannot be empty: the parse *will* fail. That is to say that {lo du'u
> kei} is not grammatical.
>
> mu'o mi'e la tsani

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.