Received: from mail-we0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:42493) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T91YG-00020m-Oc; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:25:07 -0700 Received: by weyu3 with SMTP id u3sf2459785wey.16 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:24:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=saK+m5eynsRlJviqWnTyM5I8EFde7ASKR0DC5sDD9fk=; b=wPUZHcb9A7+U5yD2PTclIBFYzwbjBBRBPUVfxUebTcVJ1a4jcdWPfAJCHxPsjRACbZ 7/LMzgeAZxiCNvBuMulD3XNb8cn6ImBZvi2oEOmlB0DUegCvyfQrmhQlL1zvQwBjN8LQ qeoS2i9dxiMr4c9USimwrp/Q/nhQkHmv4rGPfGf/SHhmAg32A3bmmEgdY21nRuU6N66G pR47BuH8Pp3oHOrJjBx/9GHhMtQdN7QHdAAilJJpkHP3f8EOF60YyjAgGijLVsftfKck uAiMOE0Z/HTBcjBi+4MBhWW35s1XnsIV54Fa4KsVvjjtq3gFMo4OJ5N9eZNz28FKcCTV JQHg== Received: by 10.180.96.129 with SMTP id ds1mr1716242wib.2.1346797489153; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:24:49 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.14.172.194 with SMTP id t42ls2637975eel.0.gmail; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:24:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.194.132 with SMTP id m4mr19616570een.0.1346797488291; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:24:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.194.132 with SMTP id m4mr19616569een.0.1346797488277; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:24:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5si23414582eep.0.2012.09.04.15.24.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:24:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.178; Received: by eaac12 with SMTP id c12so2118575eaa.37 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:24:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.181.132 with SMTP id l4mr28276741eem.17.1346797488157; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:24:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.95.78 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 15:24:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <02c05dfc-7cc4-4ec6-a331-d915e2e9cdbf@s5g2000vbj.googlegroups.com> References: <369b1b83-0407-4ccf-aa59-89a5ffbaf473@googlegroups.com> <02c05dfc-7cc4-4ec6-a331-d915e2e9cdbf@s5g2000vbj.googlegroups.com> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:24:48 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Where should I use sets and where should I use masses? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 2335 On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:52 AM, ianek wrote: > On 4 Wrz, 09:04, tijlan wrote: >> >> Can a set engage in an event? > > Not a set, but its members: > x1 (set) has members who mutually/reciprocally x2 (event [x1 should be > reflexive in 1+ sumti]). > > "mutually" is not something similar to carrying a piano, together or > otherwise. It's a property of a set, not its members. It's the members of the set, not the set, who mutually x2. > It's a property of being a clique http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clique_(graph_theory). If you restrict "simxu" to the cliques of graph theory, you can't use it for something like: lo zajba pu simxu lo ka ce'u ce'u sanli kei gi'e se morna lo remna pramide "The gymnasts stood on one another's shoulders and formed a human pyramid." It's better to create a more specialized word for the more specialized meaning and leave the basic word for the more general meaning. > That way it's more logical, and hey, Lojban was designed to be a > logical language, not an easy language (we already have Esperanto!). How is it more logical? If a simxu is a set, you can always define: ko'a simcmigunma ko'e = ko'a gunma lo cmima be lo simxu be ko'e "simcmigunma" is no more nor less logical than "simxu". It's just more useful, so it should get the simpler form. > Otherwise we can throw away sets completely, because now you can't say > {lo ro jbopre ku zvati ti gi'e se cmima mi}. If you can do with masses > everyting you can do with sets, we don't need them. Exactly! For every broda that for whatever reason was defined as having a set in x1 you can define a new selbri "brodycmigunma" with meaning "ko'a gunma lo cmima be lo broda (be ko'e bei ko'i ...), with an x1 argument that is more tractable than a set, so sets are not really needed. Sets are useful in a language without plural reference, but if you have plural reference it doesn't make much sense to have sets. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.