Received: from mail-gh0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]:40630) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T9hvS-0004kZ-19; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:39:50 -0700 Received: by ghbf16 with SMTP id f16sf1762487ghb.16 for ; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:39:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1YVFJiaF227JaXUqn2bIxac6bZztoKx5Wzk80xOhLAw=; b=BxVkXaz1JrVTdr6Ej7WyjERyYhVUG4psER5YiVzuoiu4Rf6ih2G7mK5qsUp2UvGeUb pMHxAEqZ9/OopHEngcD4NFQt5JOH8GpOc1NFu/Z8SBG57QTMdG8qr62CUgLdOff40+l6 7yP6YP4HdhGMohbbckGO4YkbztY3bmMd7zbeZmamwoZQxPXpdChGwJo3nQ6a5UQ6E1/T 2vo2cOCrTVn1lavKh5YLbjDK0WJEQEqllPGPyQ+SQsktJjVvvEHBwK+bRiGoGQAxKjyS Z4UjOmbCzrJ9oQGXjunb34BxRLjMu1DJpN9JaN9zMfMV10hzJuX/8NOiCerzuX1CBpSx SHFQ== Received: by 10.52.35.104 with SMTP id g8mr611437vdj.19.1346960375452; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:39:35 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.175.170 with SMTP id cb10ls1203770vdc.1.gmail; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:39:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.90.69 with SMTP id bu5mr641298vdb.6.1346960374555; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by q20g2000vbx.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:39:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <369b1b83-0407-4ccf-aa59-89a5ffbaf473@googlegroups.com> <02c05dfc-7cc4-4ec6-a331-d915e2e9cdbf@s5g2000vbj.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/21.0.1180.89 Safari/537.1,gzip(gfe) Message-ID: <07b7573a-45c9-44be-9d03-a74aa2b1127d@q20g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Where should I use sets and where should I use masses? From: ianek To: Lojban Beginners X-Original-Sender: janek37@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of janek37@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=janek37@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 2790 On 5 Wrz, 00:24, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:52 AM, ianek wrote: > > On 4 Wrz, 09:04, tijlan wrote: > > >> =A0Can a set engage in an event? > > > Not a set, but its members: > > x1 (set) has members who mutually/reciprocally x2 (event [x1 should be > > reflexive in 1+ sumti]). > > > "mutually" is not something similar to carrying a piano, together or > > otherwise. It's a property of a set, not its members. > > It's the members of the set, not the set, who mutually x2. > > > It's a property of being a cliquehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clique_(g= raph_theory). > > If you restrict "simxu" to the cliques of graph theory, you can't use > it for something like: > > lo zajba pu simxu lo ka ce'u ce'u sanli kei gi'e se morna lo remna pramid= e > "The gymnasts stood on one another's shoulders and formed a human pyramid= ." So what {simxu} really means? That the graph is connected? Arguments based on something that sounds good in a natural language are suspicious for me. The definitions of Lojban words are (in most cases) in a natural language, but it doesn't mean that they should be ambiguous. mu'o mi'e ianek > It's better to create a more specialized word for the more specialized > meaning and leave the basic word for the more general meaning. > > > That way it's more logical, and hey, Lojban was designed to be a > > logical language, not an easy language (we already have Esperanto!). > > How is it more logical? If a simxu is a set, you can always define: > > ko'a simcmigunma ko'e =3D ko'a gunma lo cmima be lo simxu be ko'e > > "simcmigunma" is no more nor less logical than "simxu". It's just more > useful, so it should get the simpler form. > > > Otherwise we can throw away sets completely, because now you can't say > > {lo ro jbopre ku zvati ti gi'e se cmima mi}. If you can do with masses > > everyting you can do with sets, we don't need them. > > Exactly! For every broda that for whatever reason was defined as > having a set in x1 you can define a new selbri "brodycmigunma" with > meaning "ko'a gunma lo cmima be lo broda (be ko'e bei ko'i ...), with > an x1 argument that is more tractable than a set, so sets are not > really needed. Sets are useful in a language without plural reference, > but if you have plural reference it doesn't make much sense to have > sets. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.