Received: from mail-vc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:63731) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TMXVl-0004QX-Jv; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 22:10:17 -0700 Received: by mail-vc0-f189.google.com with SMTP id fl17sf1974371vcb.16 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 22:10:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=dzGsnnXI80xoDKvlc0TMunWx7+1StdrMMndjc1S2J9w=; b=SllWuwuWw4MC+ssX8AkE18oLCh8T00W8AgHWYaZwduj/DQfrzVrlElq47xMLpkuWXo okCwDQVxLriMUKLwQFaJSikDmq96zBU/X46uqmOBM61w1OOF1zflR1EQQIdDvcz6BstI IYCWFm+mJquN73q9XQ4ZGsorJr2ISreQZetWiPuYDsVcVwcXF8svlXsZfjVTQjLWb9GE xKUB7KQhkORTOF9JyZSwkZi4H3j6FipTbtkSK81H0MMSV2Rm2FFN9nH7DutJsmUwSgWs iX0E3bPKiqzbq6zQZcbv5se3zq5ODR5Oq6m4NvIxHV01t5ydAuGLKuLs+pEc2t+CGqw8 rZ8A== Received: by 10.68.135.103 with SMTP id pr7mr872357pbb.7.1350018606356; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 22:10:06 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.237.161 with SMTP id vd1ls9076473pbc.3.gmail; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 22:10:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.233.130 with SMTP id tw2mr882811pbc.12.1350018605948; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 22:10:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 22:10:04 -0700 (PDT) From: ".iocikun.juj." To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <3dce2eae-f93d-4ce4-8965-3d6b61a7f7bf@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] I think I can use "kau" to express Japanese "ga" and "wa" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: yoshikuni.jujo@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1351_26090500.1350018604879" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 7189 ------=_Part_1351_26090500.1350018604879 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ki'e la tsani ki'e .asiz. It's true that "watashi ga/wa iku" are declarations. These are not=20 questions. I understand that I can use {ba'e}. {ba'e mi klama} =3D "watashi ga iku" {mi ba'e klama} =3D "watashi wa iku" But {ba'e} is vague. To use kau may be more strict. I think that listener's knowledge is essential to languages. {mi djuno lodu'u la djan. kau klama} is "I know that it's John who go". Listener may know someone goes, but may not know who goes. It mean: [Tom go, Jack go, John go ... ] -> [John go] Before meaning list is narrowed to after meaning list. I think its essential to language that [before meaning list] is narrowed to= =20 [after meaning list]. I want to strictly express this narrowing by {kau}. I want to use {kau} outside {du'u}. It's good that I can say following. la djan. kau klama (You know that someone goes. I inform you that it's John who goes) And I can do ordering more strictly. {mi viska da gi'e da prami ko} is "Please show me the person who loves you"= =20 or "Please be loved by the person who I see". And {mi viska kau da gi'e da prami ko} is "Please show me the person who=20 loves you". [I don't see X and X loves you, I see X and X loves you ... ] -> [I see X= =20 and X loves you] And {mi viska da gi'e da prami kau ko} is "Please be loved by the person=20 who I see". [I see X and X don't loves you, I see X and X loves you ...] -> [I see X=20 and X loves you] I want you to understand "before meaning list". I don't know that this expression is appropriate. And the idea is essential to languages, isn't it? 2012=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8812=E6=97=A5=E9=87=91=E6=9B=9C=E6=97=A5 13=E6=99=821= 3=E5=88=8618=E7=A7=92 UTC+9 .asiz.: > > On 12 October 2012 00:16, Jacob Errington >=20 > wrote:=20 > > {.i do xu klama} "Is it you who goes?" (as opposed to someone else)=20 > > {.i do klama xu} "Are you *going*?" (as opposed to doing something else= )=20 > >=20 > > I understood that "watashi ga/wa iku" are declarations, not questions...= =20 > > In any case, it is relevant to point that, in the case of yes/no=20 > questions,=20 > the non-initial position of {xu} marks the preceding element as a focus= =20 > of the question, no doubt or debate on that.=20 > > In other words, if {kau} marked the focus of sentences in general,=20 > the following pairs could be considered equivalent.=20 > {.i do xu klama} ~ {.i xu do kau klama}=20 > {.i do klama xu} ~ {.i xu do klama kau}=20 > > mu'o=20 > mi'e .asiz.=20 > > > On 11 October 2012 17:21, .iocikun.juj. >=20 > wrote:=20 > >> English "I go" is "watashi ga iku" or "watashi wa iku" in Japanese.=20 > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lo= jban-beginners/-/AJcx7K0EBzYJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den. ------=_Part_1351_26090500.1350018604879 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ki'e la tsani
ki'e .asiz.

It's true that "watashi ga/wa iku" are = declarations. These are not questions.

I understand that I can use {= ba'e}.
{ba'e mi klama} =3D "watashi ga iku"
{mi ba'e klama} =3D "wata= shi wa iku"

But {ba'e} is vague.
To use kau may be more strict.
I think that listener's knowledge is essential to languages.

{= mi djuno lodu'u la djan. kau klama} is "I know that it's John who go".
L= istener may know someone goes, but may not know who goes.

It mean:[Tom go, Jack go, John go ... ] -> [John go]
Before meaning list is= narrowed to after meaning list.

I think its essential to language t= hat [before meaning list] is narrowed to [after meaning list].
I want to= strictly express this narrowing by {kau}.

I want to use {kau} outsi= de {du'u}.
It's good that I can say following.

la djan. kau klama=
(You know that someone goes. I inform you that it's John who goes)
<= br>And I can do ordering more strictly.

{mi viska da gi'e da prami k= o} is "Please show me the person who loves you" or "Please be loved by the = person who I see".
And {mi viska kau da gi'e da prami ko} is "Please sho= w me the person who loves you".
[I don't see X and X loves you, I see X = and X loves you ... ] -> [I see X and X loves you]
And {mi viska da g= i'e da prami kau ko} is "Please be loved by the person who I see".
[I se= e X and X don't loves you, I see X and X loves you ...] -> [I see X and = X loves you]

I want you to understand "before meaning list".
I do= n't know that this expression is appropriate.
And the idea is essential = to languages, isn't it?

2012=E5=B9=B410=E6=9C=8812=E6=97=A5=E9=87=91= =E6=9B=9C=E6=97=A5 13=E6=99=8213=E5=88=8618=E7=A7=92 UTC+9 .asiz.:On 12 October 2012 00:16, Jacob Erringt= on <nict...@gmail.com> wrote:
> {.i do xu klama} "Is it you who goes?" (as opposed to someone else= )
> {.i do klama xu} "Are you *going*?" (as opposed to doing something= else)
>

I understood that "watashi ga/wa iku" are declarations, not questions..= .

In any case, it is relevant to point that, in the case of yes/no questi= ons,
the non-initial position of {xu} marks the preceding element as a focus
of the question, no doubt or debate on that.

In other words, if {kau} marked the focus of sentences in general,
the following pairs could be considered equivalent.
{.i do xu klama} ~ {.i xu do kau klama}
{.i do klama xu} ~ {.i xu do klama kau}

mu'o
mi'e .asiz.

> On 11 October 2012 17:21, .iocikun.juj. <yoshiku...@gmail= .com> wrote:
>> English "I go" is "watashi ga iku" or "watashi wa iku" in Japa= nese.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/l= ojban-beginners/-/AJcx7K0EBzYJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_1351_26090500.1350018604879--