Received: from mail-vc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:42495) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TNMHA-00030t-NK; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 04:22:38 -0700 Received: by mail-vc0-f189.google.com with SMTP id fl17sf3704003vcb.16 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 04:22:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=WLSQkjGVkzcNFWJocQ60b9+Fr97wfk0HB+i6gjhOX/I=; b=xjt8QZz6lZzu31qwEJEAFpEAo7rlpzLRWhzt1Lxd/RUOzO/l7rHCYh+pNaH0gUzKKb SoYYZ7xvm+nJng6jH29kjQtyzVbPi79dIXoMSCdm9LHRU6z44AwPE6AYTWxfLHWr8s/e Mgg/RU2j9JjXDk8vyG7k8zrBV6jvxAL499s5IuMOxw8mkK+BhE6lCYk46OukqbiUd27E m7HNhlhc+zHQRU2YP9/AGkXxhItrWsbygN7JOsM5f2kI6MQO+CjpESH9zifKBmgw8pGG TPcDcDRTam51aKhT9mhlST9UQKz92sFKBfZo2/vGFo+oGNbvXSYZwxVDbW+/rbbJqriT vsuQ== Received: by 10.236.149.66 with SMTP id w42mr1156386yhj.18.1350213742105; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 04:22:22 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.172.18 with SMTP id z18ls963538ano.4.gmail; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 04:22:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.155.70 with SMTP id i46mr1173040yhk.3.1350213741664; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 04:22:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 04:22:20 -0700 (PDT) From: gleki To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <60259ad5-0d81-4a69-8224-dc7f11318f42@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <6be716be-fc45-4938-9ed8-8242e26b6483@googlegroups.com> References: <6be716be-fc45-4938-9ed8-8242e26b6483@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Place structure vs. grammatical morphemes MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_549_23094254.1350213740538" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 5980 ------=_Part_549_23094254.1350213740538 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sunday, October 14, 2012 2:35:55 PM UTC+4, mashers wrote: > > > On Saturday, 13 October 2012 20:44:17 UTC+1, .asiz. wrote: >> >> The roles _exist_? What is the role of dunda3? Is it the same as the one >> of >> klama2, as suggested by the English preposition "to", or is it the same >> as >> the role of xamgu2, as suggested by the use of the dative in Latin? In >> other >> words, is it like the destination of a movement or the beneficiary of an >> act? >> >> Also, what are the roles of pritu{1,2,3}? > > > I posted this earlier but it didn't appear. Apologies if it appears twice. > > Yes the roles exist, but I didn't mean to imply any overlap between them. > That's why I said previously that a more complete set of morphemes would be > required if you wanted to speficy them explicity. So the English concept > "to" would be broken down into multiple morphemes, each of which expressing > one of the concepts expressed by the English "to". (I'm referring to > English only as an example. Of course, the actual morphemes required would > reflect the possible concepts which could be expressed within the > environment, rather than within other languages.) > I don't understand. If English "to" has multiple meanings then why should Lojban be polysemous just like English? But if you want one morpheme for one meaning of English "to" this is how Lojban already works. There are also short forms of predicates. e.g. {seka'a} is kinda preposition that corresponds to the target of movement, roughly it's English "to". However, it's better to call such prepositions with a Lojbanic term "sumtcita" to avoid references to ambiguous western terms. I must also note that {fa'a} that denotes direction of a vector and also roughly corresponds to English "to/towards" can be used in many cases. However, in "I give this TO you" and "I go TO you" the word TO may not always denote the same relation. Therefore, {fa'a} is not a universal cure. And lastly, I suggest learning Lojban, become fluent in it. Then we can talk about such things in Lojban itself. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/-tNJWkM9fqsJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. ------=_Part_549_23094254.1350213740538 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sunday, October 14, 2012 2:35:55 PM UTC+4, mashers wrote:
On Saturday, 13 October 2012 20:4= 4:17 UTC+1, .asiz. wrote:=20
The roles _exist_? What is the role o= f dunda3? Is it the same as the one of
klama2, as suggested by the Engl= ish preposition "to", or is it the same as
the role of xamgu2, as sugge= sted by the use of the dative in Latin? In other
words, is it like the = destination of a movement or the beneficiary of an act?

Also, what = are the roles of pritu{1,2,3}?
 
I posted this earlier but it didn't appear. Apologies if it appears tw= ice.
 
Yes the roles exist, but I didn't mean to imply any overlap between th= em. That's why I said previously that a more complete set of morphemes woul= d be required if you wanted to speficy them explicity. So the English conce= pt "to" would be broken down into multiple morphemes, each of which express= ing one of the concepts expressed by the English "to". (I'm referring to En= glish only as an example. Of course, the actual morphemes required would re= flect the possible concepts which could be expressed within the environment= , rather than within other languages.)

I don't understand. If English "to" has multiple meanings then why should= Lojban be polysemous just like English?
But if you want one morp= heme for one meaning of English "to" this is how Lojban already works.

There are also short forms of predicates. e.g. {seka'a= } is kinda preposition that corresponds to the target of movement, roughly = it's English "to". However, it's better to call such prepositions with a Lo= jbanic term "sumtcita" to avoid references to ambiguous western terms.

I must also note that {fa'a} that denotes direction of= a vector and also roughly corresponds to English "to/towards" can be used = in many cases.

However, in "I give this TO you" an= d "I go TO you" the word TO may not always denote the same relation. Theref= ore, {fa'a} is not a universal cure.

And lastly, I= suggest learning Lojban, become fluent in it. Then we can talk about such = things in Lojban itself. :)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/l= ojban-beginners/-/-tNJWkM9fqsJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_549_23094254.1350213740538--