Received: from mail-qa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]:43783) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TcPsB-0005Hs-EE; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:15:03 -0800 Received: by mail-qa0-f61.google.com with SMTP id d18sf1990461qae.16 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:14:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=upFvK1racBEYDnFfRkyGUJ1JAQgCQBfFZdmnhMmntBM=; b=n8RPn5zsUHmZw5BppHXgHSgd/9iadCTc5uaeSnWmIv3YqhBbdqwIvnegzDpvYBkw/2 mRrAkD0SAxmi49eL/SY+6hzcJ45pI12OtRqif1TykSDwWPpclywesWfeBKZLMjANqUy1 0GqzRxbZ0qwY4plSMvdz/lKG0X411YsYiV5YYvS8+AjFl02DNxPFKEk13DgQG9InyqDd TUFz/8RMHLTq89ioCyxWC3Q9qevAMW1G7v7qkW/70H/CrEm3iyyo9to9lE8kH9rlSqu0 D1kl6dutECLsCkQtwU/9/mx9MiDJZVuzfk2ldln3GiWTfE9gH6PlO/IARnR4KfG9mAT+ XmNQ== Received: by 10.49.73.70 with SMTP id j6mr1536334qev.4.1353802492965; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:14:52 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.17.103 with SMTP id n7ls1125408qed.2.gmail; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:14:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.71.135 with SMTP id v7mr1578628qeu.28.1353802492566; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:14:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:14:51 -0800 (PST) From: mudri To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <43530517-2bea-4234-911c-46532135347a@e25g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> References: <67d99907-4a24-4a62-8375-ca38bca9d13f@googlegroups.com> <6d0543ad-85f1-4bf1-a2d2-1dd6ce37e8c3@n8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <1410965.0A3Eqz1JoD@caracal> <43530517-2bea-4234-911c-46532135347a@e25g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: ma xe fanva zoi gy Countless stars were twinkling in the sky gy MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: jammyatjammy@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_940_16133605.1353802491779" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 7409 ------=_Part_940_16133605.1353802491779 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As I see it, {so'a} and {piso'a} return multiple individuals and a single= =20 part of some whole, respectively. For example: {so'a lo tarci} =3D almost all of the stars (with each star being considere= d=20 individually) {piso'a loi tarci} =3D almost all of the mass of all stars (all considered = as=20 a mass) On {so'e} and {so'a} being inconsistent with the rest of the series, I kind= =20 of agree. They both make reference to some whole, whereas the other three= =20 don't. They all, however, are supposed to be relative, which may mean that= =20 all 5 refer to some implicit whole. I don't know. On Saturday, 24 November 2012 21:53:17 UTC, ianek wrote: > > It isn't infinite, but I used {ci'i} as a hyperbole. Maybe {so'iso'i}=20 > or something would be good, but it doesn't sound very serious. BTW,=20 > {so'e} and {so'a} are defined as 'most' and 'almost all', but it=20 > doesn't make much sense since 1. they fit in the {so'V} sequence of=20 > imprecise numerals and the other three do not refer to being a part of=20 > something, 2. there are compounds {piso'e} and {piso'a} and they mean=20 > 'most of' and 'almost all of', which for me is the same.=20 > > What I mean is: the sequence is decrementing imprecise numerals:=20 > {so'a}, {so'e}, {so'i}, {so'o}, {so'u}. But if translated according to=20 > definitions in jbovlaste, they don't work like that: "many stars" may=20 > mean arbitrarily many stars, while "most stars" would mean that=20 > there's some set of stars and we're talking about a majority of them.=20 > Completely other thing. And if we want to say that, we might as well=20 > use {piso'e}: "most of the stars" and it would mean the same. So, as=20 > for me, {so'e} and {so'a}, as defined in jbovlaste, are inconsistent=20 > with the rest of this series.=20 > > I may be, and probably am very wrong about all this, but there goes my=20 > rant. I'd like to be able to use {so'e tarci} for 'lots of stars' and=20 > {so'a tarci} for 'uncountable stars'. Only that I'm not sure why=20 > "decimal point lots" would then mean "most", ie. more than half. Oh=20 > well.=20 > > mu'o mi'e ianek=20 > > On 24 Lis, 22:12, Pierre Abbat wrote:=20 > > On Saturday, November 24, 2012 11:26:33 ianek wrote:=20 > > > I'd try to translate it as {ci'i tarci pu carmi bu'u lo tsani}, but I= =20 > > > may be very wrong. There's no simple word for twinkle, flicker or=20 > > > blink.=20 > >=20 > > I'd say {kliniota} for "blink", but that probably wouldn't be understoo= d=20 > by a=20 > > non-French-speaker. A possible word for "twinkle" is {camdesku}.=20 > >=20 > > The number of stars isn't infinite, it's just too many for humans to=20 > count. You=20 > > could say {ni'e bacterkancu}, but that's a bit long.=20 > >=20 > > Pierre=20 > > --=20 > > When a barnacle settles down, its brain disintegrates.=20 > > J=E1 n=E3o percebe nada, j=E1 n=E3o percebe nada.=20 > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lo= jban-beginners/-/-0D5hSXY8mAJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den. ------=_Part_940_16133605.1353802491779 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As I see it, {so'a} and {piso'a} return multiple individuals and a single p= art of some whole, respectively. For example:
{so'a lo tarci} =3D almos= t all of the stars (with each star being considered individually)
{piso'a loi tarci} =3D almost all of the mass of all stars (all considered= as a mass)

On {so'e} and {so'a} being inconsisten= t with the rest of the series, I kind of agree. They both make reference to= some whole, whereas the other three don't. They all, however, are supposed= to be relative, which may mean that all 5 refer to some implicit whole. I = don't know.

On Saturday, 24 November 2012 21:53:17 UTC, ianek wrote= :
It isn't infinite, but I used= {ci'i} as a hyperbole. Maybe {so'iso'i}
or something would be good, but it doesn't sound very serious. BTW,
{so'e} and {so'a} are defined as 'most' and 'almost all', but it
doesn't make much sense since 1. they fit in the {so'V} sequence of
imprecise numerals and the other three do not refer to being a part of
something, 2. there are compounds {piso'e} and {piso'a} and they mean
'most of' and 'almost all of', which for me is the same.

What I mean is: the sequence is decrementing imprecise numerals:
{so'a}, {so'e}, {so'i}, {so'o}, {so'u}. But if translated according to
definitions in jbovlaste, they don't work like that: "many stars" may
mean arbitrarily many stars, while "most stars" would mean that
there's some set of stars and we're talking about a majority of them.
Completely other thing. And if we want to say that, we might as well
use {piso'e}: "most of the stars" and it would mean the same. So, as
for me, {so'e} and {so'a}, as defined in jbovlaste, are inconsistent
with the rest of this series.

I may be, and probably am very wrong about all this, but there goes my
rant. I'd like to be able to use {so'e tarci} for 'lots of stars' and
{so'a tarci} for 'uncountable stars'. Only that I'm not sure why
"decimal point lots" would then mean "most", ie. more than half. Oh
well.

mu'o mi'e ianek

On 24 Lis, 22:12, Pierre Abbat <p...@bezitopo.org> wrote:
> On Saturday, November 24, 2012 11:26:33 ianek wrote:
> > I'd try to translate it as {ci'i tarci pu carmi bu'u lo tsani= }, but I
> > may be very wrong. There's no simple word for twinkle, flicke= r or
> > blink.
>
> I'd say {kliniota} for "blink", but that probably wouldn't be unde= rstood by a
> non-French-speaker. A possible word for "twinkle" is {camdesku}.
>
> The number of stars isn't infinite, it's just too many for humans = to count. You
> could say {ni'e bacterkancu}, but that's a bit long.
>
> Pierre
> --
> When a barnacle settles down, its brain disintegrates.
> J=E1 n=E3o percebe nada, j=E1 n=E3o percebe nada.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/l= ojban-beginners/-/-0D5hSXY8mAJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_940_16133605.1353802491779--