Received: from mail-da0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:41687) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TX8Fz-0000pj-Ff; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 02:25:48 -0800 Received: by mail-da0-f61.google.com with SMTP id k18sf3716923dae.16 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 02:25:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Q5tG/+yCJHucyxAwm9n1Y6zbRM+xZCYqFw+R7e8LT2c=; b=j/f1f9gFqNx88PmruDisgW7FBpisRYq+MEIk/NnLf6BIHUbD3R/MFIlXvQIX+e2BtY s6EDANU0Ihmgj3kwr3KozRWoK3fscelwSP1WHIg6NDpA7qJ8ycVujS2S6I3qoNAl47eN bQ+g3KCyLtojQR3JhbTz7pSF5Vm9lJMhN8QkbkWt2qIrOPx3jh4WSnsmq38zdvYbpisK WxbYmxcIkTPdTgKJqooPu1e42sGsaI78SWJknyE0MrMx9A2YrebY3XHUiQfmK59eJs0s 7GaKLyNHqn1Wm4nABs12UsGSI2xfVUyF6OSdEQYPqRAwKj0eUt97PaVk3jZjzUkeY7NK 31XQ== Received: by 10.52.76.136 with SMTP id k8mr2855374vdw.13.1352543136306; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 02:25:36 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.107.208 with SMTP id c16ls5675856vcp.3.gmail; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 02:25:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.71.38 with SMTP id r6mr2862776vdu.12.1352543134469; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 02:25:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 02:25:33 -0800 (PST) From: mudri To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <5cf31818-40f2-4792-811c-7c37edbbbf14@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <1a4e8250-2c4c-428e-a89d-c2932db22160@googlegroups.com> References: <508D9016.1020409@plasmatix.com> <1a4e8250-2c4c-428e-a89d-c2932db22160@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] "Should" and "would" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: jammyatjammy@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_41_14840064.1352543133832" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 5647 ------=_Part_41_14840064.1352543133832 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 What does {da'i} actually do? Is it a bit like {pau}, in that it's helpful but only the {nai} form changes the meaning? On Saturday, 10 November 2012 07:00:02 UTC, la gleki wrote: > > I should add that Lojban follows one interesting principle of language > planning called "facultative precision". > > In short, > 1. if you remove words from a Lojbanic utterance you slowly lose > precision. > 2. And vice versa, of course (by adding more words you prove that Lojban > is the most precise language in the world, although, this second aspect of > Lojban is unfortunately known much more than the 1st aspect). > > So e.g. when you remove {da'i} the sentence becomes more vague but it *does > not get the opposite or another meaning*. > > The principle is described in the following article > . > No wonder they mention Loglan (however, they criticize it based on their > subjective biased feelings). > > On Friday, November 9, 2012 10:41:21 PM UTC+4, Michael Turniansky wrote: >> >> I disagree that da'i is not needed below. Without it, the sentence >> reads "Since I am I chicken, there is no road crossing." >> --gejyspa (12 days behind in email. I had brought it down to 9, >> but have been busy at work.) >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 4:05 PM, selpa'i wrote: >> >>> Sometimes, the "would" appears together with an if-clause, in which case >>> a {da'i} isn't always needed: >>> >>> mi va'o lo nu [da'i] mi jipci cu na kuckla lo dargu >>> If I was a chicken, I wouldn't cross the road. >>> >>> Here the {da'i} is not strictly needed, because the event tagged by va'o >>> is not claimed by the speaker. The {da'i} can be used to add emphasis on >>> the non-factualness of the sentence, however. >>> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/T0ZOzW8AIZ4J. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. ------=_Part_41_14840064.1352543133832 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What does {da'i} actually do? Is it a bit like {pau}, in that it's helpful = but only the {nai} form changes the meaning?

On Saturday, 10 Novembe= r 2012 07:00:02 UTC, la gleki wrote:
I should add that Lojban follows one interesting principle of langua= ge planning called "facultative precision".

In short,&nb= sp;
1. if you remove words from a Lojbanic utterance you slowly l= ose precision. 
2. And vice versa, of course (by adding more= words you prove that Lojban is the most precise language in the world, alt= hough, this second aspect of Lojban is unfortunately known much more than t= he 1st aspect).

So e.g. when you remove {da'i} the= sentence becomes more vague but it does not get the opposite or another= meaning.

The principle is described in the following= article.
No wonder they mention Loglan (however, they cr= iticize it based on their subjective biased feelings).

On Friday, November 9, 2012 10:41:21 PM UTC+4, Michael Turniansky = wrote:
  I dis= agree that da'i is not needed below.  Without it, the sentence reads "= Since I am I chicken, there is no road crossing."
      =     --gejyspa (12 days behind in email. I had brought it down to = 9, but have been busy at work.)


On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 4:05 PM, se= lpa'i <m...@plasmatix.com> wrote:
=
Sometimes, the "would" appears together with an if-clause, in which ca= se a {da'i} isn't always needed:

mi va'o lo nu [da'i] mi jipci cu na kuckla lo dargu
If I was a chicken, I wouldn't cross the road.

Here the {da'i} is not strictly needed, because the event tagged by va'o is= not claimed by the speaker. The {da'i} can be used to add emphasis on the = non-factualness of the sentence, however.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/l= ojban-beginners/-/T0ZOzW8AIZ4J.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_41_14840064.1352543133832--