Received: from mail-yh0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:60145)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban-beginners+bncBDJPBGEE6QFRBAVSTOCQKGQEH4J4K3A@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1TZWC9-000663-U6; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:23:42 -0800
Received: by mail-yh0-f61.google.com with SMTP id o21sf655438yho.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:23:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version
         :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id
         :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=H5vbnE5xn8G3nCXRFW4kJnzpJ4lAktOA0ESb24QpRBg=;
        b=pZ4hN85owTnagBDdC2qvnA13W7cwuln3fVn6+Dw3x3vglfy2A0ocII+dyV4BH8RCxb
         P88K8L8eO3zc8hp4Mpo+5PbGvoNXcPhzGj9BqxpaJuULVfLY3lCdik3VPy172JA33QbV
         nS1su1jCuabbY7zrO/fqSbIdH4CorUkkokaVtqSyONPQ69ZdVvJwpXeWaCwHlOxbGopL
         m4Nt8XI1WGZlBEP8kCsRqrDkS1rRKET6ZPjjFo9TCiduAZj/fhwTfeR4hTgSigkPmd0A
         8Cuq8fkw+6Uuw9oavqfO/quSAvY0nmPUtXzQ9wtcNY8Nn8Lg1BSBFUHS7UAdMbQ2kLvt
         nayg==
Received: by 10.49.72.40 with SMTP id a8mr1362691qev.13.1353111811237;
        Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:23:31 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.49.76.65 with SMTP id i1ls1126364qew.55.gmail; Fri, 16 Nov
 2012 16:23:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.5.105 with SMTP id r9mr1380669qer.0.1353111810095;
        Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:23:30 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:23:29 -0800 (PST)
From: mudri <jammyatjammy@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <7993ccf4-52ce-465b-b92f-fadee95d2d30@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [lojban-beginners] {ko} and {do} with .a-/.e- attitudinals
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: jammyatjammy@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban-beginners.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban-beginners+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:lojban-beginners+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:googlegroups-manage+300742228892+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_48_79522.1353111809764"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
Content-Length: 2260

------=_Part_48_79522.1353111809764
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Should {ko} be used in sentences marked with {.e'o}? It's something I see 
often (and usually do myself), but {do} is generally used with {.e'u} in 
particular. My thought was that, because attitudinals beginning with "a" 
and "e" (and some "i") show that the marked text is a hypothetical 
assertion, not a real one, using {do} would be the correct thing for the 
hypothetical world (in which la'e {do} is actually doing what is said in 
the sentence). .iepei

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/TvcWQD5E-v0J.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.


------=_Part_48_79522.1353111809764
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Should {ko} be used in sentences marked with {.e'o}? It's something I see o=
ften (and usually do myself), but {do} is generally used with {.e'u} in par=
ticular. My thought was that, because attitudinals beginning with "a" and "=
e" (and some "i") show that the marked text is a hypothetical assertion, no=
t a real one, using {do} would be the correct thing for the hypothetical wo=
rld (in which la'e {do} is actually doing what is said in the sentence). .i=
epei

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
Lojban Beginners" group.<br />
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.c=
om/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/TvcWQD5E-v0J">https://groups.google.com/d/msg/l=
ojban-beginners/-/TvcWQD5E-v0J</a>.<br />=20
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.<br =
/>
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@=
googlegroups.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
-beginners?hl=3Den.<br />



------=_Part_48_79522.1353111809764--