Received: from mail-ia0-f189.google.com ([209.85.210.189]:34729) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TgAQo-0007nD-Ou; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:34:19 -0800 Received: by mail-ia0-f189.google.com with SMTP id b35sf3813359iac.16 for ; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:34:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aPO7RY3397sGZNnx+vKKkzknQ14wvpztDXfIfZyrgeQ=; b=qqdcF3m8Zz5NK5aa7aoxOMWGzrIptSx6jXfNWam6gctnBB9gr2tSSWm/VVM1uw2hfu FDFOU3Ex7qeswSFD2bpuPvtoX1p39JolyOPFG7QnvYtU0xt/FJlEb6ytpB8DR2SB5Xo1 i1oM5yQdyffC9lC88WxXk6fKEl6nvS4UGCcPidEYN2QMKC4YyJbzV5FJLlCIhU2DsjJw GCf4S9itOKbLEcpNDv+UCpl39kf168Ng12yFEPMrvHesN6KlmdVFWjADEva2f+b3fzze F6tm/B0riewDSrsAgOD8FYvgJeXdKpRwOdFbFN+8DMmc6Hkcyo6NyyENSj82G5B+muzU imxw== Received: by 10.49.72.169 with SMTP id e9mr3655786qev.3.1354696447831; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:34:07 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.35.73 with SMTP id f9ls799663qej.27.gmail; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:34:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.116.139 with SMTP id jw11mr3589612qeb.12.1354696446521; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:34:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by v9g2000yql.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 00:34:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 00:34:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <33272af0-7522-44d7-a040-e451bf851595@googlegroups.com> <3c1628ec-40a0-41fd-90a9-65e110d9ab0a@googlegroups.com> <96205a36-c08f-4ebe-877e-112c22a5aefc@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/537.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/22.0.1229.79 Safari/537.4,gzip(gfe) Message-ID: <5c52564a-f822-49b1-b8c9-745f53613b34@v9g2000yql.googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Why no "about" brivla? From: ianek To: Lojban Beginners X-Original-Sender: janek37@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of janek37@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=janek37@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 3125 I don't think {nu} is good for describing relationships, rather {ka}. When in doubt, you can always use {su'u}. I get the feeling that {nu} is somewhat overused. mu'o mi'e ianek On 5 Gru, 04:33, Michael Turniansky wrote: > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:29 PM, tijlan wrote: > > >> On 4 December 2012 10:12, Jonathan Jones wrote: > >> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:36 AM, tijlan wrote: > > >> >> On 3 December 2012 04:15, Jonathan Jones wrote: > >> >> > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Annie > >> wrote: > > >> >> >> How do you get "is dedicated to" out of "is related to"? > > >> >> > I'd like to know that myself. > > >> >> If I wrote a book in dedication to koha and made that explicit on a > >> >> page, a link would have been created between the book and koha. > >> >> Suppose koha is a high-profile celebrity and my book happens to be > >> >> monumentally controversial for its own content; koha's manager does= n't > >> >> appreciate the publicized unduly link and calls me demanding that {= lo > >> >> cukta co'u srana ko'a tai zo'e}, where {zo'e} refers to the fact th= at > >> >> koha's name is on the book's particular page unrelated to the book'= s > >> >> topic itself. > > >> >> mu'o > > >> > Not only is that example extremely contrived, it is also not an exam= ple > >> of > >> > srana being "dedicated to", and I highly doubt any manager would say= "A > >> book > >> > is completed pertinent to ko'a in the obvious form" to yell at someo= ne > >> for > >> > putting a name in a book. More likely they'd just say "Why is {name}= 's > >> name > >> > in you book? I want it out, NOW!" > > >> Still, "x1 is dedicated to x2" is a kind of relation, just as "x1 > >> plans x2 for process x3" (platu) is. > > > Yes, but neither of those are srana. > > =A0 In my opinion the discussion here defines ckini too broadly. =A0srana= has a > broad meaning, and it's basically the relationship that "pe/ne" has with > the two sumti have. =A0ckini, on the other hand, is more specifically a > kinship relationship. =A0The x1 and x2 would basically have to belong to = the > same set, or at best one being a member of the superset of the other. =A0= For > example, I don't think that "la djan" and "lo zdani be la djan" would > properly be described as being a ckini relationship, despite the fact you > could argue =A0that "la djan ckini lo zdani be la djan lo nu se zdani" is > valid and true. =A0But I could say something like "lo mlatu cu ckini lo c= info > lo nu jutsi". =A0The preceding is just my opinion. YMMV > =A0 =A0 =A0--gejyspa --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.