Received: from mail-qa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]:64149) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TgFjn-0001dk-UM; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 06:14:25 -0800 Received: by mail-qa0-f61.google.com with SMTP id k4sf1278976qaq.16 for ; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 06:14:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=/naif+6TpVIALdYlugSrNJT5RbcfIlMGZKOi2K8cEG0=; b=pg1oHyC0+yrgeeKuCSDDRygcOH6b2SDg0PJqRIK1zU2+mnw/4JjRmQD8NMa7FSpU3h 0F5iipXJkDebDihUZM4V2ksiWHo78SbAthySOaXroPO+coYEVh+/y3rvVYaS+WXqQ8ye lQe3SKmJ09usDPrBtionOEIqkTVJvkK/XHb3hUuv064HWdFHYgK4Wfk8mGF7sUxpJP/u MYaCyI4DCcd+wXK4ZvKcm9kdPTqh14TX3EUIQdZO+swyVi9AfPET0TAmuWINAdRm0pM5 f8Cv5TfHqbnL6GH0ik1YPIYDXDGWTAP/VAD97Ca6DJJkIbeEInfc6iSzziMBpf69cw+b ecGQ== Received: by 10.49.24.13 with SMTP id q13mr3742887qef.33.1354716845416; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 06:14:05 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.58.238 with SMTP id u14ls947247qeq.66.gmail; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 06:14:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.239.41 with SMTP id vp9mr6269657vec.38.1354716844092; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 06:14:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.239.41 with SMTP id vp9mr6269656vec.38.1354716844067; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 06:14:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h20si1451828vdg.3.2012.12.05.06.14.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 05 Dec 2012 06:14:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.182 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.182; Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id fo14so7643686vcb.27 for ; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 06:14:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.208.141 with SMTP id gc13mr15215768vcb.55.1354716843947; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 06:14:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.65.233 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 06:13:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <33272af0-7522-44d7-a040-e451bf851595@googlegroups.com> <96205a36-c08f-4ebe-877e-112c22a5aefc@googlegroups.com> <5c52564a-f822-49b1-b8c9-745f53613b34@v9g2000yql.googlegroups.com> From: Jacob Errington Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:13:38 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Why no "about" brivla? To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec517a6744136d404d01b98c5 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 6459 --bcaec517a6744136d404d01b98c5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 5 December 2012 08:27, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:22 AM, ianek wrote: > >> On 5 Gru, 10:43, Jonathan Jones wrote: >> > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:34 AM, ianek wrote: >> > > I don't think {nu} is good for describing relationships, rather {ka}. >> > > When in doubt, you can always use {su'u}. I get the feeling that {nu} >> > > is somewhat overused. >> > >> > {nu} is the NU equivalent of {lo}. It's never wrong. >> >> No. {su'u} is the NU equivalent of {lo}: generalized abstractor (how); >> x1 is [bridi] as a non-specific abstraction of type x2 >> >> {nu} is "generalized event abstractor; x1 is state/process/achievement/ >> activity of [bridi]." >> That means, {nu} can stand for each of: {za'i}, {pu'e}, {mu'u}, >> {zu'o}, maybe {li'i} (but I doubt that; experience is not an event), >> but not for {du'u}, {jei}, {ka}, {ni}, {si'o} and of course {su'u}, >> which is more general. >> > > Hey, I'm just telling you how it is. I'm not saying that {nu} should be > the default, it just happens to be that it IS. > > Well, provided the extensive conversations *in* Lojban in IRC that I have done with other jbopre of very respectable proficiency, I feel obligated to mention (especially seeing as this is lojban-beginners, after all) that {nu} is not the default. A quick look in the CLL (or the dictionary, as ianek did, ki'e) will tell you that nu is the event abstractor. The CLL explicitly mentions that {nu} can't be used in djuno2, which clearly refutes that {nu} is the default abstractor. Sure, {nu} is used in a lot of places where some might argue that {ka} is better, and that's fine; usage has spoken in favour of {nu} in those places. However, that *does not* make {nu} the "default" abstractor. It just so happens that it is probably the most *common* abstractor. Avoiding these types of confusion is important in a beginners list where members might actually believe that it is OK to use {nu} everywhere, which is what your message suggests. ianek is correct, {su'u} is the default abstractor that is comparable to {zo'e} in that it is vague as to which real abstractor it represents. .i mi'e la tsani mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. --bcaec517a6744136d404d01b98c5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 5 December 2012 08:27, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>= wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:22 AM= , ianek <janek37@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5 Gru, 10:43, Jonathan Jones <eyeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:34 AM, ianek <jane...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't think {nu} is good for describing relationships, rath= er {ka}.
> > When in doubt, you can always use {su'u}. I get the feeling t= hat {nu}
> > is somewhat overused.
>
> {nu} is the NU equivalent of {lo}. It's never wrong.

No. {su'u} is the NU equivalent of {lo}: generalized abstractor (= how);
x1 is [bridi] as a non-specific abstraction of type x2

{nu} is "generalized event abstractor; x1 is state/process/achievement= /
activity of [bridi]."
That means, {nu} can stand for each of: {za'i}, {pu'e}, {mu'u},=
{zu'o}, maybe {li'i} (but I doubt that; experience is not an event)= ,
but not for {du'u}, {jei}, {ka}, {ni}, {si'o} and of course {su'= ;u},
which is more general.

Hey, I'm just tel= ling you how it is. I'm not saying that {nu} should be the default, it = just happens to be that it IS.
=A0

Well, provided the extensive conversations *in* Lojban in IRC that I h= ave done with other jbopre of very respectable proficiency, I feel obligate= d to mention (especially seeing as this is lojban-beginners, after all) tha= t {nu} is not the default. A quick look in the CLL (or the dictionary, as i= anek did, ki'e) will tell you that nu is the event abstractor. The CLL = explicitly mentions that {nu} can't be used in djuno2, which clearly re= futes that {nu} is the default abstractor.

Sure, {nu} is used in a lot of places where some might = argue that {ka} is better, and that's fine; usage has spoken in favour = of {nu} in those places. However, that *does not* make {nu} the "defau= lt" abstractor. It just so happens that it is probably the most *commo= n* abstractor. Avoiding these types of confusion is important in a beginner= s list where members might actually believe that it is OK to use {nu} every= where, which is what your message suggests.

ianek is correct, {su'u} is the default abstractor = that is comparable to {zo'e} in that it is vague as to which real abstr= actor it represents.

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o=

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.
--bcaec517a6744136d404d01b98c5--