Received: from mail-oa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.219.61]:50498) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TfC91-0003VX-Q6; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 08:11:58 -0800 Received: by mail-oa0-f61.google.com with SMTP id o6sf1947960oag.16 for ; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 08:11:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1kNDHIdJeAuZ5T7fCHwcHT3SAciiCtGo8I+yCj9TnW4=; b=dBQ0yLfi90a+uuFCWZY/iEayJdK9LPrWbMYDbyldkqXTamQwxa/3Dlu4LU07tPJCSS mJjEi9dHGR62h7RLXQ7H5O5Bc40JadLHaLiW/56NaQcV34c+Adgl8BxZ7CLxlTSs/wy3 yHjdDBMZZKbleY3WVmjRNmQ3fTZ+8zxUkUdnP1cTtu39JDh+mCeT8gq8UyhgEhp9ASUX fA53drFEHHWTkud5/JcnhhCU9j0086eVD6tdy3hC6JbWsWQ3E84QjqKDsf1WjVV8mPvL /T0LDQ9Rdqnrm03pJTcxaMd/KsIpiJleSvHxip7nTCQXuLJP8UA+eUs2rJssTO816aym x8JQ== Received: by 10.49.48.41 with SMTP id i9mr1674894qen.36.1354464705234; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 08:11:45 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.1.80 with SMTP id 16ls1460478qek.61.gmail; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 08:11:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.71.169 with SMTP id w9mr1779417qeu.7.1354464703931; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 08:11:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by r4g2000vbi.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 08:11:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 08:11:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <33272af0-7522-44d7-a040-e451bf851595@googlegroups.com> <3c1628ec-40a0-41fd-90a9-65e110d9ab0a@googlegroups.com> <748b91a9-e6b3-485e-8049-0f5d2521350e@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/537.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/22.0.1229.79 Safari/537.4,gzip(gfe) Message-ID: <52cb5d10-6c2a-4891-beca-953d468849cf@r4g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Why no "about" brivla? From: ianek To: Lojban Beginners X-Original-Sender: janek37@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of janek37@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=janek37@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 7885 While having antonyms ({citno} =3D {to'e laldo} etc.) is okay and synonyms with switched places ({xabju} =3D {ze zdani} etc.) are acceptable, having two gismu where one's terbri is a prefix of the other's is just plain silly. Why not add all the new gismu for other prefixes too? Like "x1 is a book", "x1 is a book containing work x2" etc. The gismu keywords/definitions aren't sacred, there are many known misleading ones. I guess this applies to {srana} too. mu'o mi'e ianek On 2 Gru, 16:47, Jacob Errington wrote: > FWIW, I define {srana} in lojban as follows: > {.i lo ka ce'u srana ce'u cu ka ce'u bu'a ce'u} > And actually being able to say *what* that bu'a is is what led me to a po= st > much earlier about "srana3", which indeed, I now realise, would make > {srana} essentially identical to {ckini}. > (With a srana3, the definition becomes {.i lo ka ce'u srana ce'u cu ka ce= 'u > ce'u me'au ce'u}) > > Thus, I currently believe that srana can be defined in terms of ckini as > such: > {.i lo ka ce'u srana ce'u cu ka ce'u ce'u ckini lo ka co'e} > Things that are relevant to each other are simply related by an obvious > relationship. > > .i mi'e la tsani mu'o > > On 2 December 2012 08:02, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 2:48 AM, la gleki wr= ote: > > >> On Sunday, December 2, 2012 1:32:48 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote: > > >>> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 1:03 AM, la gleki wrot= e: > > >>>> On Sunday, December 2, 2012 11:15:01 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote: > > >>>>> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, la gleki wr= ote: > > >>>>>> On Sunday, December 2, 2012 10:50:42 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 11:09 PM, la gleki = wrote: > > >>>>>>>> On Sunday, December 2, 2012 1:30:39 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:17 AM, tijlan wrot= e: > > >>>>>>>>> On 1 December 2012 12:09, ianek wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > This is just what {se srana} or {selra'a} is. > > >>>>>>>>>> An about, a thematic focus, is more specific than that. cfika2= , > >>>>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>> instance, may be as much relevant to cfika1 as cfika3 may be -= - a > >>>>>>>>>> work > >>>>>>>>>> of fiction cu srana both its plot and its author (and possibly > >>>>>>>>>> many > >>>>>>>>>> other things). Consider: > > >>>>>>>>>> la .alis. cfika sera'a lo nixli > > >>>>>>>>>> This doesn't necessarily say that the plot revolves around a g= irl > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> it could as well be saying the work is dedicated to a girl. > > >>>>>>>>> I'm sorry, I don't see how anything based on {srana} could > >>>>>>>>> possibly mean "dedicated to". You'll have to explain. > > >>>>>>>> Well, may be it's not that something is wrong with > >>>>>>>> {sera'a/pe/srana} but rather wrong usage and/or glossing. > > >>>>>>>> *srana x1 pertains to/is germane/relevant to/concerns/is > >>>>>>>> related/associated with/is about x2.* > >>>>>>>> *ckini =A0x1 is related to/associated with/akin to x2 by > >>>>>>>> relationship x3.* > > >>>>>>>> If we arbitrarily chose parts of those definitions we'd get > >>>>>>>> * =A0srana x1 is relevant to x2 > >>>>>>>> =A0 ckini =A0x1 is relevant to x2 > >>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>> which is nonsense. > > >>>>>>> ckini wouldn't be that. For one thing, you left out the x3, and f= or > >>>>>>> another, it isn't "relevant", it's "related". The Cold War isn't = relevant > >>>>>>> to WWII, but it is related (by being a direct result of it). > > >>>>>> Sorry, it should be > >>>>>> * =A0srana x1 is releted to x2* > >>>>>> * =A0ckini =A0x1 is related to x2 by relationship x3* > > >>>>> Well, by that definition, srana is {ckini fi zi'o}, which makes the= m > >>>>> synonyms in the same way that litru is to klama (litru =3D {klama z= i'o zi'o}). > > >>>> Haven't you read my previous post? I mean that choosing words from f= ull > >>>> definitions ARBITRARILY can lead to this result which is nonsense. > >>>> ju'o it's all bad glossing. > >>>> I suggest that srana refers to topic and ckini means "to be associat= ed > >>>> with". > >>>> to dedicate is {finfriti}, {tecu'u} etc. > > >>> No, ko'a srana ko'e means that ko'a is relevant to ko'e, i.e. ko'a ha= s > >>> something to do with ko'e. > > >>> While it is true that the topic of something is pertinent, something > >>> which is pertinent is not necessarily the topic. > > >> Then what is your opinion about my first post? Is it true that "topic" > >> brivla has right to exist on it's own? > > > My opinion is that sera'a serves the purpose. As I said, "that which is > > pertinent to A" is a superset of "the topic of A". > > >> =A0Roosevelt is pertinent to the Great Depression, but he is most cert= ainly > >>> /not/ the topic of it. > > >>>> =A0(Btw, in my view, zi'o doesn't say that there is no such thing as > >>>>> whatever place it's in, but just that it's not important. For examp= le, > >>>>> {ko'a klama zi'o zi'o ...} doesn't mean there /isn't/ an origin or > >>>>> destination, it just means that they don't matter. Dissenters shoul= d use > >>>>> zo'e instead.) > > >>>> I think the CLL says almost the same. > > >>>>>>>> If {srana} really gives us thematic role then all the other "is > >>>>>>>> relevant to" meanings can be assigned to {ckini/seki'i}. > > >>>>> -- > >>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > >>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'= o > >>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > > >>>>> =A0-- > >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>>> Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. > >>>> To view this discussion on the web visithttps://groups.google.com/d/= ** > >>>> msg/lojban-beginners/-/**UZopTp21hiIJ > >>>> . > > >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.**com. > >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@** > >>>> googlegroups.com. > > >>>> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/** > >>>> group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den > >>>> . > > >>> -- > >>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > >>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > >>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > > >>> =A0-- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro= ups > >> "Lojban Beginners" group. > >> To view this discussion on the web visit > >>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/kQJ2iFS5UZ4J. > > >> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com= . > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > >> For more options, visit this group at > >>http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. > > > -- > > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > > > =A0-- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou= ps > > "Lojban Beginners" group. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@= googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= -beginners?hl=3Den.