Received: from mail-ia0-f192.google.com ([209.85.210.192]:38514) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1U1Mbw-00016H-JA; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:49:29 -0800 Received: by mail-ia0-f192.google.com with SMTP id r13sf1634749iar.9 for ; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:49:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-spam-score:x-spam_score:x-spam_score_int:x-spam_bar :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=xTUublfIK8sc9apNyM47ncnFaXCAGrC3oeIa2H1LfJ0=; b=Y8xmvcLB7dmxabafG8BtsfEHFQIOzNQtLQ5zbWCheY9avUmKgEbVqqBQIjvFiKAokk atbN4dpmVn3knGUQM7DQuydDx+63AnnrHXyfGzNtvFVZi+d1qfsiAB6oAr2Ce346Bkw7 PwtPoBkB2hT7U09zviaJf3nLvHUscH//VYfmAmwx6jLdSmByo+yS3VuZWaXbERdDXSLG E3W++XFjGJcMVr8PMehXPrWKxG/w46sWS7rEIRREel72POFynzom4Yq29NP/HTo7hjqp ddMjHV24fdf4fyiWRmsY7OFU4oiASZz7uEj6QUbIJ+1cGcdDNG1l5czizKu/EcGDd6kl aoZg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-spam-score:x-spam_score:x-spam_score_int:x-spam_bar :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=xTUublfIK8sc9apNyM47ncnFaXCAGrC3oeIa2H1LfJ0=; b=WeM+09GDzbqEXUlHycNWW/e5d36p5+sdnrWW82RIwhCLoYff+O75zBW9hM9pWxpoj1 B3qFPjRJ/XQsGMgXKWZegCrd8LIZYvERXHvqpody5W+wtyV7X4OIwyZ4mTP87Xf3qgTs 66MPlhFxpyki65KuUMKakSrryf8QzFa5oGFIZknf5rpxf9EQSx0+FbEzUaR31Sibe9Bp pSA4BwQSH+hczeQwBOq5N3T83NX8JRrs0zi5pYTkGr7PbWXK9VszYRTC3W2/3g/d4NWR 7SkV9IIf5Y8ol/7KxN3MEAwJiTt1EUi3MLjZ5/d3j0Q2o0O8H/II3odR1PXu38o/15bQ 6KsA== X-Received: by 10.50.157.170 with SMTP id wn10mr320124igb.10.1359748149296; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:49:09 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.220.165 with SMTP id px5ls516412igc.21.canary; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:49:08 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.86.129 with SMTP id p1mr2107964paz.24.1359748148745; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:49:08 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.86.129 with SMTP id p1mr2107963paz.24.1359748148733; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:49:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c2si1430485pav.0.2013.02.01.11.49.08 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:49:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 173.13.139.236 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of nyarly@gmail.com) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1U1Mbj-00016D-96 for lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:49:07 -0800 Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:33395) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1U1Mbd-00015z-NY for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:49:06 -0800 Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id rq13so2282869pbb.4 for ; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:48:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.78.100 with SMTP id a4mr32818844pax.4.1359748135286; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:48:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.244.1 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:48:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:48:55 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: [lojban-beginners] Place structure "types" From: Judson Lester To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / X-Original-Sender: nyarly@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 173.13.139.236 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of nyarly@gmail.com) smtp.mail=nyarly@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d042e005f96765c04d4af0824 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 4561 --f46d042e005f96765c04d4af0824 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm editing a flash card deck of lojban words for my own use, and one of the things that's struck me is how often gismu constrain the kinds of things in a position. Most of the time the constraint makes sense (at least in a "sure, I can see it" kind of way) but as I find more gismu where a position is defined as being a person or an event (and all the ones that are {ka}) when the other way might make sense, I begin to wonder more and more why (or if?) the suggested kinds for a place aren't merely a guidance. For example, I'm just looking at jenca: x1 (event) shocks/stuns x2 What would be the problem with "do jenca mi"? I suppose there's some elided abstraction that I could use in the x1 place to mean "some event related to you" - but why would that be neccesary? Or do I misunderstand - is the point that jenca describes a shock related to an event, and *therefore* "do jenca" implies that you did something shocking on the face of it? If it's the latter, are the other abstraction requirements (and other implied types) likewise looser than I imagine? Judson -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --f46d042e005f96765c04d4af0824 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm editing a flash card deck of lojban words for my o= wn use, and one of the things that's struck me is how often gismu const= rain the kinds of things in a position.

Most of th= e time the constraint makes sense (at least in a "sure, I can see it&q= uot; kind of way) but as I find more gismu where a position is defined as b= eing a person or an event (and all the ones that are {ka}) when the other w= ay might make sense, I begin to wonder more and more why (or if?) the sugge= sted kinds for a place aren't merely a guidance.

For example, I'm just looking at
<= div style>
jenca:=A0x1 (event) shocks/stuns x2

What would be the problem with "do jenca mi"? =A0I supp= ose there's some elided abstraction that I could use in the x1 place to= mean "some event related to you" - but why would that be neccesa= ry?

Or do I misunderstand - is the point that jenca descri= bes a shock related to an event, and *therefore* "do jenca" impli= es that you did something shocking on the face of it?

If it's the latter, are the other abstraction requ= irements (and other implied types) likewise looser than I imagine?

Judson

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--f46d042e005f96765c04d4af0824--