Received: from mail-wi0-f187.google.com ([209.85.212.187]:53129) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1U2rmC-0005ri-Sm; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:18:19 -0800 Received: by mail-wi0-f187.google.com with SMTP id hm14sf178715wib.4 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:18:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf:date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=lySy8Ko1aZwmb7dZVKf9sNjThbjAmtOCYdEXCxm34Pk=; b=frjPIzD/ePGwaPzuW2D9deKMGnNtk6wzcmfqJqs9pAG6DdvymQiOxFrdKMJXGsgF8C u71GbmjS90WL9FkvfqvsHje1H23t1Uk95+/5LsGUaHtkfux729KmmP0yRkC9/l6MH0dZ Sq4Gmr3g0H1fzOOlYYs4ky1FMHCu1VE4XZlKpLOicgxbAQsgah6fZRltyFvKKfRI5unT jBx3WJOc46ff83aaooTBYkx6AYEg9HaSEuRaDAulwvJ/GXX+fOGOuddnwrnJ3DJdSfwX gOEmuqmaFDoDfbmWKhZrn6b4HJeP1nLljFLUqPfompDcI3LJrWQvp9alWVjB7xEtlaJF 5XzQ== X-Received: by 10.180.105.132 with SMTP id gm4mr107138wib.2.1360106281634; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:18:01 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.84.98 with SMTP id x2ls1094014wiy.27.canary; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:18:00 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.0.196 with SMTP id 44mr27723129eeb.6.1360106280437; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:18:00 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.0.196 with SMTP id 44mr27723128eeb.6.1360106280421; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:18:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from dd17822.kasserver.com (dd17822.kasserver.com. [85.13.138.119]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6si2265863eej.0.2013.02.05.15.18.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:18:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) client-ip=85.13.138.119; Received: from samsa (brln-4dbc22e3.pool.mediaWays.net [77.188.34.227]) by dd17822.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A3273865056; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 00:17:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 00:17:58 +0100 From: v4hn To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Cc: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Place structure "types" Message-ID: <20130205231758.GU10399@samsa.fritz.box> References: <88ff2b8e-3289-4df0-a88c-01ad3d71998f@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PhxIMoEr374zxJm2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: me@v4hn.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) smtp.mail=me@v4hn.de Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 1898 --PhxIMoEr374zxJm2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:26:00AM -0500, Ian Johnson wrote: > For example, it is sensible to consider a universe of discourse > in which all the concrete objects exist in this universe. strange, but ok > Consider such a discourse, and suppose John > believes (incorrectly ru'a) that unicorns exist. still ok > {la djan [srera] krici lo du'u da pavyseljirna gi'e zasti} is completely fine. sure > {la djan [srera] krici lo du'u lo pavyseljirna cu zasti} is slightly weirder, > since now {lo pavyseljirna} should actually have a referent in the universe of discourse, Why should that be weird? The reference will create a new referent in the UD in my opinion. You can't keep the UD fixed anyway. > but we can wave our hands a little and allow for du'u-scope to induce > little universes of their own. No, we can't, because this kind of stupid reasoning creates the monkey sentence paradox and other problems as you've mentioned below. > {lo pavyseljirna cu [srera] jai se krici la djan fai lo ka ce'u zasti} > (something like "unicorns are believed by John to exist") is far more troubling, > because now there's really no syntactic excuse for {lo pavyseljirna} not being > in the universe of discourse. doi la latro'a joi la .John. do'u Please point me to some linguistic literature on the kind of universe of discourse you are using in these discussions. Papers are fine. It seems I disagree with the assumptions you make about them and we're running around in circles without a real basis. mi'e la .van. mu'o --PhxIMoEr374zxJm2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlERkyYACgkQMBKLZs4+wjz0fACff0CtgADTZJN31g4WjOWQpmZA OREAniTQY8A5pCDkjZIrMPJX0nKnIZH0 =QgB5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PhxIMoEr374zxJm2--