Received: from mail-qc0-f185.google.com ([209.85.216.185]:39280) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1U4ON1-0006eH-65; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:18:36 -0800 Received: by mail-qc0-f185.google.com with SMTP id b14sf1753904qcs.2 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:18:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=0uSIsvX5zaf1bvokyA8ASaQPI70SMvSmVPp1NJ4jVW8=; b=iuGBzb9T0uBZr4XMv32A0RxhoQgpRyZsI347boU9TXuiDPBKEmh5hnuAueYbI072AU 9IfsfNVB1fmypIH+q8dIujnzXJG/5TPHxs5eIhtgfTydprBdFoqPN4sibHfM9zWsnZ+J lKp67Bi0QPByQblKYYe4Gn3dSeaFjsWPDklERb/XjyVyGrfvWdmZUJ/3yzEhPIo5oCs4 9zK75XZItjDJA+qCw83t6Yd44vj9VJPiZlCiklx90A+xja3WaOVyRAX6BMKOPGrUsvUh 2NeUXErTnwwphseSgvEfFBPdv+dR4eEDN0pX2BZKbKCQn09p18PXiKV6F8XPgo2OR5O2 eboA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=0uSIsvX5zaf1bvokyA8ASaQPI70SMvSmVPp1NJ4jVW8=; b=uv4PhQh14y6kfMIZZ2vQxiuNvLg3chCN/mqzYeKqSn1esjWivrqh/NKLdbI14/J7OA xGrIKYbfHkAHGUThQuLFI3ZBVDxQFSj1Zj2eo0I2EE+m4tNDxA+4bjj0D+aC4KpE/chg YljwU/k5olo8PypZeE+epS1M+/sdMTVMPIfxxSpJtcgs/JvE3wMadf9LLm7zWtYBQfiW t8N8jn3TDhSDq3G7se62NhL4/STkQKGM/G66+6JV8i2egbhr/CFykQSPMlggrebrnm2A hBVXvXI5ETb8fwb4kjewyGw8CWcSNYqWK9lEdJb2uMPyYfUTnnfb5WiVZjwlboMwZA0g EBIQ== X-Received: by 10.50.159.197 with SMTP id xe5mr312969igb.3.1360469900337; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:18:20 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.183.137 with SMTP id em9ls1203845igc.13.canary; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:18:19 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.153.229 with SMTP id vj5mr5472196igb.7.1360469899776; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:18:19 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.153.229 with SMTP id vj5mr5472193igb.7.1360469899759; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:18:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (mail-ob0-f175.google.com [209.85.214.175]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5si1189190iga.1.2013.02.09.20.18.19 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:18:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.175; Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id uz6so5083437obc.20 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:18:19 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.60.4.35 with SMTP id h3mr7866822oeh.123.1360469899464; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:18:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.78.35 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 20:17:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130210031456.GF6270@samsa.fritz.box> References: <63dcdf07-3c53-4967-b50e-e3c684b4db0b@googlegroups.com> <20130210031456.GF6270@samsa.fritz.box> From: Jacob Errington Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 23:17:59 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] search for happiness. {sisku lo selgleki} or {sisku lo ka selgleki}? To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff2534a15d0fb04d55715c0 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 5872 --e89a8ff2534a15d0fb04d55715c0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 9 February 2013 22:14, v4hn wrote: > On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 09:31:12PM -0500, Jacob Errington wrote: > > On 9 February 2013 06:11, la gleki wrote: > > > search for happiness. {sisku lo selgleki} or {sisku lo ka selgleki}? > > > > > > Which translation is correct? > > > > > > > The second one, but probably not for the reasons you'd think. > > > > [...] > > > > With this definition, we can easily create a predicate meaning "to look > for > > properties that make you happy", e.g. {.i mi sisku lo ka mi gleki ce'u}. > > Didn't you mean to say events/states here instead of properties? > No, I did intend to say properties, due to my general philosophy about Lojban predicates: if an intrinsic connection between a sumti and an abstraction exists in a given selbri, then that abstraction is a property of that sumti. In some cases, this is more obvious than in other cases. What I consider to be the most obvious case is {.i mi kakne lo nu do citka lo plise}. Discovering the sheer nonsense of that sentence is what led me to believe that ka-abstractions are of paramount importance in Lojban. > That's what gleki2 is supposed to be. Mixing up terms here is confusing. It's been said in at least a few other posts, perhaps on this list, perhaps on the main list, that the type restrictions in brackets in the gismu list are not prescriptive. In fact, I've seen jcowan say that these restrictions where added in order to warn against implicit raising, which was, at the time that the list was made, the major concern with regards to abstraction places. That being said, the gismu list simply tells us that the x2 must be an abstraction, with the *suggestion* that it should be an event or state. I disagree with that suggestion, and due to its non-prescriptive nature, am entitled to use a ka-abstraction there. .i mi'e la tsani mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --e89a8ff2534a15d0fb04d55715c0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 9 February 2013 22:14, v4hn <me@v4hn.de> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 09:31:12PM -0500, Jacob Errington= wrote:
> On 9 February 2013 06:11, la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
> > search for happiness. {sisku lo selgleki} or {sisku lo ka selglek= i}?
> >
> > Which translation is correct?
> >
>
> The second one, but probably not for the reasons you'd think.
>
> [...]
>
> With this definition, we can easily create a predicate meaning "t= o look for
> properties that make you happy", e.g. {.i mi sisku lo ka mi gleki= ce'u}.

Didn't you mean to say events/states here instead of properties?<= br>

No, I did intend to say properties, due= to my general philosophy about Lojban predicates: if an intrinsic connecti= on between a sumti and an abstraction exists in a given selbri, then that a= bstraction is a property of that sumti.
In some cases, this is more obvious than in other cases. What I consid= er to be the most obvious case is {.i mi kakne lo nu do citka lo plise}. Di= scovering the sheer nonsense of that sentence is what led me to believe tha= t ka-abstractions are of paramount importance in Lojban.
=A0
That's what gleki2 is supposed to be. Mixing up terms here is confusing= .=A0

It's been said in at least a few other = posts, perhaps on this list, perhaps on the main list, that the type restri= ctions in brackets in the gismu list are not prescriptive. In fact, I'v= e seen jcowan say that these restrictions where added in order to warn agai= nst implicit raising, which was, at the time that the list was made, the ma= jor concern with regards to abstraction places.
That being said, the gismu list simply tells us that the x2 must be an= abstraction, with the *suggestion* that it should be an event or state. I = disagree with that suggestion, and due to its non-prescriptive nature, am e= ntitled to use a ka-abstraction there.

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--e89a8ff2534a15d0fb04d55715c0--