Received: from mail-pa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.220.61]:61933) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1U1P7Y-0001fp-QE; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:30:22 -0800 Received: by mail-pa0-f61.google.com with SMTP id bg2sf1723394pad.6 for ; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:30:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=pXjJsP1wO1al5b/X8Cj6KKo4r9ZFKadLPVUT0rPxf9I=; b=SlGA5Ycngr4oKoQ7fsV1Wl9+w0Qw/o6h23E4vC3kWEf+G15yDleQzn4vmFo7+s51I7 k7Q7XP1W7AaCs6EqAVz0YsmHJ3LPjO36RrRARQKz4+9N1BacHAflTtBIo3zQnniry+72 mxoyJahVGDSdROg29jxW+Af9MVGmdMCFnbjeVbHgIc/UVEE2RCdf0GdJlj/N75uh6L9N 7KmPhpHA4GLZtrXynfUdZpIChqb3EGhlRHQPLXyk7FE38ZNVtSXhX/7Cen6d2grkOyi+ +eqwYgufhTqefRYp8h1/BjQxMk37rFgJlqYAQ86OjVUzKDIfkXdiJB2FXhl+oCX3GYMo +46g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=pXjJsP1wO1al5b/X8Cj6KKo4r9ZFKadLPVUT0rPxf9I=; b=tst34qpTQOtT+XiHykKUAs8WXjuPCORyecyDrCGhcHEP7e/RkbUjb22MCis7hDLtwB upCWF4c9akl6LYqeqUCDUuIWnniV1/y0tbxQ8xF+7hZov4KvS/elwuQy58NE8RdJibmq yZyDYtxbbEgYD46gajlwU05YQoRuPrPv1Kef5QdGZCX7eap9T3XasfPjWzHmVE/tHYGx 7Kodv7RZJqTUfmFm9TjkjeFr6xKGKe5R/2BwGitRng38JQ+oAV0Ur2eMmKTp+Pef1XCw qjqjiTfskXGsFhQK3VtWrkcrCwtTw6jypdb7Rz7j7ybKLNr2mQ/HVC7Eygv8jnptnEV6 FGQQ== X-Received: by 10.50.186.202 with SMTP id fm10mr48602igc.10.1359757801835; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:30:01 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.12.233 with SMTP id b9ls586913igc.4.gmail; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:30:01 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.72.98 with SMTP id c2mr1915387pav.28.1359757801379; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:30:01 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.72.98 with SMTP id c2mr1915386pav.28.1359757801364; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:30:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-da0-f52.google.com (mail-da0-f52.google.com [209.85.210.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sd3si1436949pbb.1.2013.02.01.14.30.01 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:30:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nyarly@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.52; Received: by mail-da0-f52.google.com with SMTP id f10so1880701dak.11 for ; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:30:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.253.137 with SMTP id aa9mr36620938pbd.102.1359757801274; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:30:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.244.1 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 14:30:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 14:30:01 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Place structure "types" From: Judson Lester To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nyarly@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nyarly@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nyarly@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b162e09b9bdad04d4b14825 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 4991 --047d7b162e09b9bdad04d4b14825 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > What would be the problem with "do jenca mi"? I suppose there's some >> elided abstraction that I could use in the x1 place to mean "some event >> related to you" - but why would that be neccesary? >> > > Simply because the English "You shocked me!" actually means "What you just > did shocked me!". This has to do with the issue "sumti raising", which has > been bandied about countless times throughout the years. > I've got two follow on questions, then: 1. The easy one: "tu'a do jenca mi" would be semantically valid, though? Maybe a little vague, but if you've just punched me in the face, maybe clear enough and readier to hand than "le nu do darxi fo le mi flira cu jenca mi" 2. More philosophical: granted that it doesn't make *sense* most of the time that do jenca - because people aren't shocking - why isn't the convention that such places raise their sumti automatically? Or is the idea that maybe there could be a brain-interacting object that fills the space? Come to think, would it be reasonable to say something like "lo sidbo jenca mi" or would it still need an abstraction related to 'lo nu sidbo fi mi' ? #2 in play as a "why not?" if not. Judson -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --047d7b162e09b9bdad04d4b14825 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus= @gmail.com> wrote:
What would be the problem with &qu= ot;do jenca mi"? =A0I suppose there's some elided abstraction that= I could use in the x1 place to mean "some event related to you" = - but why would that be neccesary?

Simply because the English "You shoc= ked me!" actually means "What you just did shocked me!". Thi= s has to do with the issue "sumti raising", which has been bandie= d about countless times throughout the years.

I've got two follow on que= stions, then:

  1. The = easy one: "tu'a do jenca mi" would be semantically valid, tho= ugh? =A0Maybe a little vague, but if you've just punched me in the face= , maybe clear enough and readier to hand than "le nu do darxi fo le mi= flira cu jenca mi"
  2. More philosophical: granted that it doesn't make *sense* most= of the time that do jenca - because people aren't shocking - why isn&#= 39;t the convention that such places raise their sumti automatically? =A0Or= is the idea that maybe there could be a brain-interacting object that fill= s the space?
Come to think, would it be reasonable to say something like= "lo sidbo jenca mi" or would it still need an abstraction relate= d to 'lo nu sidbo fi mi' ? =A0#2 in play as a "why not?" = if not.

Judson

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--047d7b162e09b9bdad04d4b14825--