Received: from mail-ia0-f192.google.com ([209.85.210.192]:51741) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1U1PMq-0001ia-Cc; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:46:01 -0800 Received: by mail-ia0-f192.google.com with SMTP id r13sf1682128iar.9 for ; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:45:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=F2zV3FMUCTq4/TAzugAi0l2KSkV6sPn9YHW0tmWgQLA=; b=LSoMAFhLEkBYu4LmtJuNGqn/N1AlEmcCFRYcMF5qBibzkni5Od3Fuw0uJjnqjjxMvf wMH+O5COxOPhlLniazcuP9S1PykgOseGU9b39iUOo67bMS4XSyxQCy0xcJlzulM9jxJ7 10ytoaICFWO+G7DCHKanCQWWtq/Q+UUMnTJ0KNgw4a6/Cb432GkMadxXdvkhrc8lhdFd ueYL4z815hFGwkBF4JxAlXSItrM69GR0gW5Rn1ISzJWqND44qAaJIMhFxzM9All7LciC qSGh2ziJuq8lszFMl0horVy2l+q+Kx4PWlQIvkCxABKCVU/GcKULiK4cKAY5pQWbg7SJ z7jQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=F2zV3FMUCTq4/TAzugAi0l2KSkV6sPn9YHW0tmWgQLA=; b=yueKXQ+W90QggoLw7Eytu+ngYzbxvmIMJ3gI6gIlr58EnTtU7k8DBFxbFqsdIlSe0j riXYXYMdZXBpd9MFMCY9bLGYYaHjCdRf+YPR24lZujZ6WmSGCgFqCeay6nL/E39N9/2G xztj18wkro66I1xKVHwGQKHPj9TbNUb4PcFlHrZO5DGwnp/bbisJWz2+i4+AHLflKXDj D1E/LZNMrwdJdZTxTZ/B1zcsAhCJ2dSPLKR6bzNAYlOvI65Qv1NCXi6QXCS7p3ltv0C+ Y/Ma8+JRjphdo1e2aeJeO6XSZDg7oS/O1LnSNcDE9pBKi0yVGj0m8YKYK+RwZQ7BLHcG C7WQ== X-Received: by 10.49.24.13 with SMTP id q13mr1358847qef.33.1359758749708; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:45:49 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.24.13 with SMTP id q13ls1417475qef.57.gmail; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:45:48 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.58.45.10 with SMTP id i10mr6342174vem.36.1359758748269; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:45:48 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.58.45.10 with SMTP id i10mr6342173vem.36.1359758748250; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:45:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com (mail-vc0-f174.google.com [209.85.220.174]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q13si2382534vdh.0.2013.02.01.14.45.48 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:45:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.174; Received: by mail-vc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id n11so2744686vch.19 for ; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:45:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.214.6 with SMTP id gy6mr10329711vcb.8.1359758748056; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:45:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.165.196 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 14:45:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:45:47 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Place structure "types" From: Ian Johnson To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9cdc787287b8a04d4b18120 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 8088 --14dae9cdc787287b8a04d4b18120 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Allowing for implicit raising leads to issues when you go to use articles to extract places from such bridi. For example, you get {lo jenca} and now if you allow for implicit raising you can't tell whether it's an event or a concrete object. This makes it border on useless by itself because you don't even know what sort of thing it is. Making the distinction with tu'a/jai is quick and clarifies matters. (That said, the lack of consistency in what the gimste deems to be raising and what isn't is a bit of a problem. fenki is an example of this.) mi'e la latro'a mu'o On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Judson Lester wrote: > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > >> What would be the problem with "do jenca mi"? I suppose there's some >>> elided abstraction that I could use in the x1 place to mean "some event >>> related to you" - but why would that be neccesary? >>> >> >> Simply because the English "You shocked me!" actually means "What you >> just did shocked me!". This has to do with the issue "sumti raising", which >> has been bandied about countless times throughout the years. >> > > I've got two follow on questions, then: > > > 1. The easy one: "tu'a do jenca mi" would be semantically valid, > though? Maybe a little vague, but if you've just punched me in the face, > maybe clear enough and readier to hand than "le nu do darxi fo le mi flira > cu jenca mi" > 2. More philosophical: granted that it doesn't make *sense* most of > the time that do jenca - because people aren't shocking - why isn't the > convention that such places raise their sumti automatically? Or is the > idea that maybe there could be a brain-interacting object that fills the > space? > > Come to think, would it be reasonable to say something like "lo sidbo > jenca mi" or would it still need an abstraction related to 'lo nu sidbo fi > mi' ? #2 in play as a "why not?" if not. > > Judson > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --14dae9cdc787287b8a04d4b18120 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Allowing for implicit raising leads to issues when you go to use articles t= o extract places from such bridi. For example, you get {lo jenca} and now i= f you allow for implicit raising you can't tell whether it's an eve= nt or a concrete object. This makes it border on useless by itself because = you don't even know what sort of thing it is. Making the distinction wi= th tu'a/jai is quick and clarifies matters. (That said, the lack of con= sistency in what the gimste deems to be raising and what isn't is a bit= of a problem. fenki is an example of this.)

mi'e la latro'a mu'o

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Judson Lester <= nyarly@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:
On Fri, F= eb 1, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> w= rote:
What would be the problem with &qu= ot;do jenca mi"? =A0I suppose there's some elided abstraction that= I could use in the x1 place to mean "some event related to you" = - but why would that be neccesary?

Simply because the English "You shoc= ked me!" actually means "What you just did shocked me!". Thi= s has to do with the issue "sumti raising", which has been bandie= d about countless times throughout the years.

I've got two follow on que= stions, then:

  1. The easy one: "tu'a= do jenca mi" would be semantically valid, though? =A0Maybe a little v= ague, but if you've just punched me in the face, maybe clear enough and= readier to hand than "le nu do darxi fo le mi flira cu jenca mi"=
  2. More philosophical: granted that it doesn't make *sense* most of th= e time that do jenca - because people aren't shocking - why isn't t= he convention that such places raise their sumti automatically? =A0Or is th= e idea that maybe there could be a brain-interacting object that fills the = space?
Come to think, would it be reasonable to say something like "= ;lo sidbo jenca mi" or would it still need an abstraction related to &= #39;lo nu sidbo fi mi' ? =A0#2 in play as a "why not?" if not= .

Judson

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginn= ers?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
=A0
=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--14dae9cdc787287b8a04d4b18120--