Received: from mail-ie0-f188.google.com ([209.85.223.188]:38306) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UWuxD-00044S-78; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:45:47 -0700 Received: by mail-ie0-f188.google.com with SMTP id k5sf2253344iea.15 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:45:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=MYjYPxXTo5Cek5/XFpwpiqvSVKR4l1UoDV63/Wv/qO8=; b=ngSvSC3Sw6Lf/eLZCO3Z0wwDaKRlX7dFikjSaGlmgTPCTpv7oMDneqb7XoKv/lNDGf 8x31juEY07OFOU/JqbSRu3Wdl1+LuI26xQAQFCcMy2Ln0IFszYJWzkUL9S/dCCmrSjXY iJQt8e7TMcssvBv1PvMZCl2COPbjcqiBT0updcURCJJyFUUAvNY/RGUZmjphbF6Qx7Bk ILItwgHjS0kIxgI4cMkfpsBgx87Eu38zeheJ4MYN6F0y1/zgNTEMggmi2lpSyYSYG03Z rrCDhqi56Mifc3u+yfo546fq6vNWVDOwkwbCKFiLOEN6dtzjEoWbAae1YDzjJUTHUNiG 7T1Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=MYjYPxXTo5Cek5/XFpwpiqvSVKR4l1UoDV63/Wv/qO8=; b=ONm5BCuMixWzOY4l55WaQrTn4WFTRzqYMZVG6NKn2CKHMvCb+uClUI1yjUykOgPGed X/suefjUSeA7RtAbh2nVd8MDjYHVdOQ2oYFun7nbTYsnQeWrRHUYrC2HZpT5LtpoE4Sg pxssVNtMo0KdLYHTKotSQf6/ph1enli44dt2UsmPICSb75BN9orBH/6AAAZq0N4er0hW 6U65eaLpCh6/pPN0lFDv4CFlS9f9waMzKs/oPbgNbnjMPbr4K1D7/YzydCia7faphBnO IyONQQIIwoevZpwYQ/617Ug1T5p2pEEVqBnW3dtHLi1fuTOJvPSFnXNwTMXP6uj7aoMb uPRQ== X-Received: by 10.50.109.228 with SMTP id hv4mr482154igb.2.1367268336914; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:45:36 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.22.178 with SMTP id e18ls527843igf.31.canary; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:45:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.76.164 with SMTP id l4mr2859243igw.3.1367268335113; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ia0-x233.google.com (mail-ia0-x233.google.com [2607:f8b0:4001:c02::233]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l10si479691ige.0.2013.04.29.13.45.35 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c02::233 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c02::233; Received: by mail-ia0-x233.google.com with SMTP id p22so5991674iad.10 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:45:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.147.100 with SMTP id tj4mr220423igb.19.1367268334972; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:45:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.13.68 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:45:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:45:34 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Mixing tenses From: Ian Johnson To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c02::233 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013a03b46b36b604db85f70a X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 4869 --089e013a03b46b36b604db85f70a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable One way would be {lo ni ko'a [ca] broda cu zmadu lo ni ko'e pu brode}. I should comment however that as a rule I don't advocate "complete" ni, since they're sort of not type safe (you can get nonsense like {lo ni mi clani cu zmadu lo ni do xendo}). mi'e la latro'a mu'o On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:31 PM, mudri wrote: > This is something I've wanted to ask for a while. I can't find a good way > to compare two non-LE-based sumti that are specifically from different > tenses. > > I can say =93x is more than y used to be=94 by saying {lo ca broda cu zma= du lo > pu brode}. But if the sumti are {ko'a} and {ko'e}, I have to resort to {l= o > ca me ko'a cu zmadu lo pu me ko'e}, which seems less than optimal. > > Is that the way it's done? Or is there something on the bridi level? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lojban Beginners" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3D= en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den= . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --089e013a03b46b36b604db85f70a Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
One way would be {lo ni ko'a [ca] broda cu zmadu lo ni= ko'e pu brode}. I should comment however that as a rule I don't ad= vocate "complete" ni, since they're sort of not type safe (yo= u can get nonsense like {lo ni mi clani cu zmadu lo ni do xendo}).

mi'e la latro'a mu'o

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:31 PM, mudri <jammyatjammy@gmail.com> wrote:
This is something I've wanted to ask for= a while. I can't find a good way to compare two non-LE-based sumti tha= t are specifically from different tenses.

I can say =93x is more than y used to be=94 by saying {lo ca= broda cu zmadu lo pu brode}. But if the sumti are {ko'a} and {ko'e= }, I have to resort to {lo ca me ko'a cu zmadu lo pu me ko'e}, whic= h seems less than optimal.

Is that the way it's done? Or is there something on= the bridi level?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginn= ers?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
=A0
=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--089e013a03b46b36b604db85f70a--