Received: from mail-pb0-f58.google.com ([209.85.160.58]:35976) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UWuxg-00046K-Ee; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:46:17 -0700 Received: by mail-pb0-f58.google.com with SMTP id mc17sf1173488pbc.23 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:46:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=td4XG/MiRNyRkz+ZYQhj1XML/40xRtjwBf+PZoZJ2o4=; b=SbWFN/JyB0rXBZtJ7rsYhB1q2S630FuVEA+SpT6yqyp6BVAjF/FFAA/qv6Bztev8Dx URugqYeJxfGE5zTxDquvowOg3O+VFezGiiPyXZTUL2KO+UMy4yCB8rL+ImI8lcChzpy4 IEyNgwZQV8QLd+VVTUo0n+3GXTYO6JG8li0cD5kfHpkiMGGIz1U03xEbLzRVK1tat/Gr cZl/RC1b2l23iS0v41X4bA0uDhyO7LNxTDYGRFaQ41yTYgD0JtA/t+UUfwbNF+sDAXxx CJbMZKGokMps4ymcO6Q6T76d0EY5UZwNHHVesx0z/YUlu//BhEzAvbPK8An60xukNbzD H2sQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=td4XG/MiRNyRkz+ZYQhj1XML/40xRtjwBf+PZoZJ2o4=; b=SKGkaSw6Hm4ERZ/lzSq0B06GL5lZ4D7Beb26H0nORV2j3ZxyWbQPk3Cg9EIH3eq3cO 2nNzAciwZnxIfQ3mebKejoNoBLkBrFM4DUvZLLjZz0p9EnuBcvp5JSk+HC795Jn6/6EH J4PjzuZPN8Jv6jpg022SI8dhKd+MLYtUg2ACKLVJ3LC2Y/XQyvD3sANkhAS20HSrSW9g yC25k8IpSGvvjva0HxlzlGzJut+R9FFaEdvuYU3DOcy4I+JYa52lOi7VaMVP8K315T5m 7Ubp6nwA684SsWMe3mhEGwwSjNfhMFW3L7/zbTjIoxeiToBMFjg6abtkYj5YkKeufmE1 iJhg== X-Received: by 10.49.35.129 with SMTP id h1mr121800qej.28.1367268364091; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:46:04 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.18.168 with SMTP id x8ls3002776qed.75.gmail; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:46:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.35.111 with SMTP id g15mr4665749qej.15.1367268362572; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:46:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:46:01 -0700 (PDT) From: mudri To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <2a49f86a-cd6c-45ed-ad45-3c61b20fedff@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <3628787.k2TgisVrPR@caracal> References: <3628787.k2TgisVrPR@caracal> Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Mixing tenses MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: jammyatjammy@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_352_10768483.1367268361744" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 3386 ------=_Part_352_10768483.1367268361744 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Say, {mi} and {do}, respectively. On Monday, 29 April 2013 21:43:57 UTC+1, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > On Monday, April 29, 2013 13:31:54 mudri wrote:=20 > > This is something I've wanted to ask for a while. I can't find a good= =20 > way=20 > > to compare two non-LE-based sumti that are specifically from different= =20 > > tenses.=20 > >=20 > > I can say =93x is more than y used to be=94 by saying {lo ca broda cu z= madu=20 > lo=20 > > pu brode}. But if the sumti are {ko'a} and {ko'e}, I have to resort to= =20 > {lo=20 > > ca me ko'a cu zmadu lo pu me ko'e}, which seems less than optimal.=20 > >=20 > > Is that the way it's done? Or is there something on the bridi level?=20 > > Could you post an example with specific x and y? It may be easier to=20 > suggest=20 > something.=20 > > Pierre=20 > --=20 > li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du=20 > li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci=20 > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den= . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_352_10768483.1367268361744 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Say, {mi} and {do}, respectively.

On Monday, 29 April 2013 21:43:57 = UTC+1, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On = Monday, April 29, 2013 13:31:54 mudri wrote:
> This is something I've wanted to ask for a while. I can't find a g= ood way
> to compare two non-LE-based sumti that are specifically from diffe= rent
> tenses.
>=20
> I can say =93x is more than y used to be=94 by saying {lo ca broda= cu zmadu lo
> pu brode}. But if the sumti are {ko'a} and {ko'e}, I have to resor= t to {lo
> ca me ko'a cu zmadu lo pu me ko'e}, which seems less than optimal.
>=20
> Is that the way it's done? Or is there something on the bridi leve= l?

Could you post an example with specific x and y? It may be easier to su= ggest=20
something.

Pierre
--=20
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_352_10768483.1367268361744--