Received: from mail-yh0-f57.google.com ([209.85.213.57]:40209) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UeZUx-0005F2-TC; Mon, 20 May 2013 16:28:19 -0700 Received: by mail-yh0-f57.google.com with SMTP id z6sf1546yhz.22 for ; Mon, 20 May 2013 16:28:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:to:subject :mime-version:date:from:in-reply-to:references:message-id:x-sender :user-agent:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=BxUNHeBZsj/ow+5/qLFMf4z0mKEGtktLD62XnE/ukBo=; b=tWBpiKc6AN+TkasqBnJDoGyuzOMO6DJZrKTti6uwto+3SVyedxnv41YE5oEiqQwIQn 4c0JE2XB42h+PWKV/8GU7qaVAL9rHvFKZ676PGUhmtf3ZM9P51l557DHiRoK+Fq2to7e jMGEth5OV16MWPRrLj9lvh6vO3veqkxBG7OrcsY75feW6s2nKxegVac0yg+o+RkRT63K SRyCRqWjFWSXlbrHskX5ZaLBh0yz5Xa5QNE1Hob8PbWF6qLAUxTgAwYOf+dg9ncMhHrG 2tta8O6hS2jo8kSGWRWmp9tuQrvMPZj5LvqZcoaeXKAd7aFC67Oai84tJKL79TCExzwt iLTQ== X-Received: by 10.50.153.101 with SMTP id vf5mr1299452igb.11.1369092485384; Mon, 20 May 2013 16:28:05 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.29.68 with SMTP id i4ls2488540igh.8.canary; Mon, 20 May 2013 16:28:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.119.37 with SMTP id kr5mr6827632igb.3.1369092484378; Mon, 20 May 2013 16:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www3.webmail.pair.com (www3.webmail.pair.com. [66.39.3.34]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id 14si1051791igi.0.2013.05.20.16.28.04 for ; Mon, 20 May 2013 16:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 66.39.3.34 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of m3o@plasmatix.com) client-ip=66.39.3.34; Received: (qmail 38507 invoked by uid 65534); 20 May 2013 23:28:03 -0000 To: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] questions about lojban MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 01:28:03 +0200 From: selpa'i In-Reply-To: References: <20130520214048.GA3114@samsa.fritz.box> <20130520221213.GB3114@samsa.fritz.box> Message-ID: X-Sender: m3o@plasmatix.com User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.8.1 X-Original-Sender: m3o@plasmatix.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 66.39.3.34 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of m3o@plasmatix.com) smtp.mail=m3o@plasmatix.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 2378 On 21.05.2013 00:24, Ian Johnson wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:12 PM, v4hn wrote: > >> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 05:49:08PM -0400, Ian Johnson wrote: >> > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:40 PM, v4hn wrote: >> > > {pa le karci} or {pa karci} (if a number preceeds the bridi you >> don't necessarily >> > > need an article, you can think about this as {pa lo karci}) can >> be used >> > > for that, an inner quantifier is not needed here. >> > >> > {pa karce} is rather unlikely to mean what you want. In particular >> it does >> > *NOT* mean the same as {pa lo karce}. Instead it actually means >> exactly >> > what {pa lo karce} meant before xorlo was implemented, that is >> "there >> > exists exactly one car such that ..." >> >> Agreed, I never use that and got confused when reading >> >> lo with an outer quantifier, which is exactly the same thing >> as just sticking a number before an item (i.e. "mu lo bakni" == "mu >> bakni" >> == "five cows), works pretty much as before: "five things that >> really are cows". >> >> at http://www.lojban.org/tiki/How+to+use+xorlo [1] . Someone might >> want to rephrase that. >> >> mi'e la .van. mu'o > > Oh wow, that's not good at all, that's completely inconsistent with > the formal definition in the proposal proper... That's exactly the part that got changed in December 2011, when the sentence "When an outer quantifier is used without an inner quantifier, ''lo'' can be omitted." was removed. This means that "PA broda = PA lo broda" *was* part of the original BPFK-approved proposal from '04. (the recent change wasn't followed by another round of voting of course) In any case, I don't think there is *such* a big difference between PA broda and PA lo broda. Both make claims about instances that broda, and neither of them select in-mind referents. It probably depends on one's conceptualization of lo broda. mu'o mi'e la selpa'i -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.