Received: from mail-la0-f58.google.com ([209.85.215.58]:60983) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Ufd8R-0003da-Rf; Thu, 23 May 2013 14:33:24 -0700 Received: by mail-la0-f58.google.com with SMTP id gw10sf463395lab.13 for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 14:33:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=pyUH51k48QmSslzYxS9OFHfjRUY/2Ufv4TFCD8gCjp8=; b=kI1G+1kBjr8bkdXMPtfPgZCdcbIaGjpPo+w5jsnoO+lQuljK0nyJlQUBazgq54f1D6 UBZa/lSDH7zbRDOS5JtL3dJK6cwTNzkmeqnmEwDT7qGXE/tChOlTequFOgbF8vMtbBbh qg9gQHBmd/Qvgbs/JDoxohID0RgJ7zlZEIZtfu/ap8QhvtN8N+FsqRgKIB5sVFdrC5hy vSQcrMOk7Za8xiRnCR0FeeMaWQoapZ85lUz2IXc6xDbAvju2nQnCiwHMHcR63RLimcv+ zTPcbdLt1xa2zd4dDdJEdWkKkkRyRO+y1+SAgfkBUlLlSV1961HckT+c5BFpvJ7x9gbi HjRg== X-Received: by 10.180.74.164 with SMTP id u4mr2166677wiv.10.1369344791750; Thu, 23 May 2013 14:33:11 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.36.77 with SMTP id o13ls88107wij.22.gmail; Thu, 23 May 2013 14:33:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.15.24.202 with SMTP id j50mr14893238eeu.1.1369344789554; Thu, 23 May 2013 14:33:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dd17822.kasserver.com (dd17822.kasserver.com. [85.13.138.119]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o5si3452350eew.0.2013.05.23.14.33.09 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 23 May 2013 14:33:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) client-ip=85.13.138.119; Received: from samsa (brln-4db8003f.pool.mediaWays.net [77.184.0.63]) by dd17822.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A84BA860247 for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 23:33:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 23:33:08 +0200 From: v4hn To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: questions about lojban Message-ID: <20130523213308.GK3114@samsa.fritz.box> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FnOKg9Ah4tDwTfQS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: me@v4hn.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) smtp.mail=me@v4hn.de Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 1414 --FnOKg9Ah4tDwTfQS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 03:02:54PM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:32 PM, stormi wrote: > > > Lojban resembles functional programming more than object oriented > > > programming. The predicate is central, and that is a function. > > > > I disagree, it resembles objected oriented programming rather strongly. > > Namely in that the first place is almost always the "do-er." > > [...] >=20 > brivla are not objects, they are functions. The fact that the first > argument of the function typically comes before the function call itself, > as in the case of {mi klama}, is irrelevant. >=20 > {mi klama lo zarci lo zdani lo dargu lo karce} is not "mi.klama( lo zarci= , > lo zdani , lo dargu , lo karce )", it is "klama( mi , lo zarci , lo zdani= , > lo dargu , lo karce )". It is neither and you're "argument", that is to say you're opinion, isn't any stronger. Did I mention that these comparisons pe'i are all invalid and irrational? mu'o --FnOKg9Ah4tDwTfQS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlGeixQACgkQMBKLZs4+wjwSNACfUyruih1C7Je+fNPagveWbbky FlsAoL/pg0vg8dEwQbedeHIt+ZuaSptK =l6Tx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FnOKg9Ah4tDwTfQS--