Received: from mail-pa0-f63.google.com ([209.85.220.63]:52678) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UpHV3-0003Dc-JJ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:28:37 -0700 Received: by mail-pa0-f63.google.com with SMTP id hz11sf1790297pad.28 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:28:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=K1NeAsWdCyUoAcqclrkel5XmlGyrkQSzvnzIPS+h2X0=; b=bUNniSmdEFB0Vw0BgfW6cSHqF7cFOC4XVZV3PrF4hapiLbQIg6cP0Vo+ngGvHAPxfh 2l3ZFCfipuubkK6oBDYSzKfa5GfxwCftUuaP9t38UX4gMKZDSRCHjPwUFp4X3nlwL++x 67btCDGfYFxRK0l8AtPoAyA3kXjr4et3c7XdXCExi0tMpwNekOEk4PazsTSgVIDwm8Q8 KlZ0bJyatX6RjqdEOuvXBmSA6OlVJpAxdDpGCnykHi0ymO/DKuyFEa3XzSqF23df02ok +I2WKCzTncEkvWvoPwbL4tmwFARhQT44Zhzr5ZSXDSH5cl0YQStH6sDzI/COLfUZ+OAs 4hFQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=K1NeAsWdCyUoAcqclrkel5XmlGyrkQSzvnzIPS+h2X0=; b=aC9V/aellnaX1tVmAigeeWiSynRARs4V5Nf2aVMJH3Wvdv4Gz23L1Jj/FFN7s1iXlV 8wOWM0JfWMtmmjEr6yr18I8E5uuWqIKE1ywCIrDveBdLoczuROZdFG2yZjQSswBIymNS Mj+C8D+PDEbVpMNt+HM1gkofA8llbAIITTSr1nK+WfovGCzQQYV5awPxE6uZQ/AUjkR5 nWR3m9xn5JuEr6UuzfDNJrv5hP0ceM/NyX4BjfD2c4MXH8CYEJzvSZAKNKB62KwjqoGT fNvYbVlyl2UIFwHIKmWz0c7JU8qfAWnlb+L3ufWYCHLa0xd5Y10gtBNNQiINbaiIbYzZ ppmg== X-Received: by 10.50.164.200 with SMTP id ys8mr898525igb.14.1371644906135; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:28:26 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.22.10 with SMTP id z10ls2242591ige.19.canary; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:28:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.21.9 with SMTP id r9mr897164ige.6.1371644902318; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:28:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:28:21 -0700 (PDT) From: guskant To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <321c0573-5e64-40c4-a82c-60e1cc4344df@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] {nei} and {no'a} in a {sei} bridi MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gusni.kantu@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1162_8463817.1371644901572" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 3315 ------=_Part_1162_8463817.1371644901572 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I repost to beginners' list my question that I put in the lojban list: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/1jw3fYM6JNI/tnMsp9n2YvsJ Is a {sei} bridi in a bridi called an embedded bridi? For example, 1) ko'a ko'e sei nei brode se'u broda 2) ko'a ko'e sei no'a brode se'u broda In which sentence is {broda} repeated; or none of them? On the other hand, I think a {to} sentence in a bridi is neither an embedded sentence nor a part of the bridi in this context. For example, 3) ko'a ko'e to nei brode toi broda 4) ko'a ko'e to no'a brode toi broda in neither 3) nor 4), {broda} is repeated; or am I wrong? A {sei} bridi is grammatically a free modifier just like a {to} sentence, but semantically a metalinguistic bridi, which is somehow similar in meaning to {BAI lonu} bridi, which is clearly an embedded bridi, in which {no'a} works. I am curious to know if {nei} ji {no'a} in a {sei} bridi repeats the main bridi. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_1162_8463817.1371644901572 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I repost to beginners' list my question that I put in the lojban list:=
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/1jw3fYM6JNI/tnMsp9n2YvsJ
Is a {sei} bridi in a bridi called an embedded bridi? For example,

= 1) ko'a ko'e sei nei brode se'u broda
2) ko'a ko'e sei no'a brode se'u b= roda
In which sentence is {broda} repeated; or none of them?
On the other hand, I think a {to} sentence in a bridi is neither an embed= ded sentence nor a part of the bridi in this context. For example,
3) ko= 'a ko'e to nei brode toi broda
4) ko'a ko'e to no'a brode toi broda
i= n neither 3) nor 4), {broda} is repeated; or am I wrong?

A {sei} bri= di is grammatically a free modifier just like a {to} sentence, but semantic= ally a metalinguistic bridi, which is somehow similar in meaning to {BAI lo= nu} bridi, which is clearly an embedded bridi, in which {no'a} works. I am = curious to know if {nei} ji {no'a} in a {sei} bridi repeats the main bridi.=  

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_1162_8463817.1371644901572--