Received: from mail-pa0-f60.google.com ([209.85.220.60]:62742) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VfywS-0000uD-JR; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:22:45 -0800 Received: by mail-pa0-f60.google.com with SMTP id fb1sf286226pad.5 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:22:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=to:subject:mime-version:date:from:in-reply-to:references:message-id :user-agent:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vD7jzHjA0Zj/039LZvV0y5iq2Xy6akPHZXtCzH3DjLo=; b=TlXidqGzrpXfCI4q/gqAkNsQQ3uJlxmloFuJAhIIoWs4Xy0FOQp3ADxOc4Eh7fkFbS DwlzrFcxWRSgSdam+qGSheoTsKat53DI2vQAkUliQkjApMGXCEdRafElEAmwSeegJv/o 4V8hNp3LFE5AfcrFf7sdXK5lamKseveqH6Oo+Ffy5smwdVh58tf9Mp5KRmmVNPdnmk47 AI8FgWa9JZSv2vfStMP7elfsZIuGZtwTQnxHimhzBpdu0/YrHoadQbMKLz88bGiajIYs vaxcfA4uTDM0QZ9z0YWL33o9kBTiYkSLPHNg9q9THV1IkWXQFAV6QErjSCjIr6jmpb9N 2Ziw== X-Received: by 10.50.138.197 with SMTP id qs5mr321725igb.7.1384204954558; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:22:34 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.178.133 with SMTP id cy5ls2545459igc.0.canary; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:22:31 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.118.37 with SMTP id kj5mr5454964pab.17.1384204951290; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:22:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from www3.webmail.pair.com (www3.webmail.pair.com. [66.39.3.34]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id 8si2770378igl.2.2013.11.11.13.22.30 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:22:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 66.39.3.34 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of m3o@plasmatix.com) client-ip=66.39.3.34; Received: (qmail 80326 invoked by uid 65534); 11 Nov 2013 21:22:30 -0000 To: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] Tanru-internal connectives, place structure, non-sense MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 22:22:30 +0100 From: selpa'i In-Reply-To: References: <64e7cd25-cdd9-46af-b396-dfce549aee2c@googlegroups.com> <216f6d9e3649c17dd8dd1bcc47381177@plasmatix.com> <03af24e3-315d-4a55-9e38-0b54e271d43f@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <2dce28baefb08686da7e56ba7734dd39@plasmatix.com> X-Sender: m3o@plasmatix.com User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.8.1 X-Original-Sender: m3o@plasmatix.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 66.39.3.34 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of m3o@plasmatix.com) smtp.mail=m3o@plasmatix.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 2410 On 11.11.2013 18:04, Michael Turniansky wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:21 AM, selpa'i wrote: >> If you say it has no x2, then I assume you would say that in: >> >> =A0 =A0mi klama je sutra lo tricu >> >> {lo tricu} actually fills klama3 and it fills neither klama2 nor=20 >> sutra2. How can this be practically used? In which case it would mean: > > =A0 No, I would not say that. =A0When I said " 'sutra je jipci' doesn't > have an x2," I wasn't generalizing to _all_ broda JA brode. =A0If you > SPECIFY something in that spot, as in your sentence, you ARE saying > the same as "mi klama gi'e sutra vau lo tricu" and you darn well > better be using something that can fit both of the underlying x2 > places (Which obviously "lo tricu" cannot) . =A0 But there is something in that place either way. It's either something=20 explicit, or it's {zo'e}. > What I was asserting was > that since the set of all things that are both se sutra and se jipci > is an empty set (as far as I can reasonably ascertain), it /de facto/ > has no x2 place, not that it has no x2 place by nature of the > construction. Okay. In other words, there is an x2, but nothing can sensibly fill it.=20 The moment you use it, the sentence becomes nonsense. {.i sutra je jipci} is the same as {.i zo'e sutra je jipci zo'e}. It=20 claims that something fills that x2. > =A0 Therefore as long as your sentence doesn't try to put something > into that place, there is no problem with asserting the sentence "mi > sutra je jipci" is meaningful (I guess, to put it another way, I am > asserting that an implicit "zo'e" (but probably not, pe'i, an=20 > explicit > "zo'e") in fact doesn't have to be something that can really exist. A {zo'e} always has some value that makes the bridi true. But whatever=20 the {zo'e} in {sutra je jipci}'s x2 is, it cannot make the bridi true=20 (because no such value exists), so the whole predicate is faulty. mu'o mi'e la selpa'i --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.