Received: from mail-qa0-f59.google.com ([209.85.216.59]:36619) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WdlFS-0006o2-Pm for lojban-beginners-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:53:34 -0700 Received: by mail-qa0-f59.google.com with SMTP id cm18sf876862qab.24 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:53:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=KZ9vpqueou0IwLq5Di7NI/CPheOB7X8DdZiyYr4PdG4=; b=R8v18diF5CNeK/8Fe0yeG4m38YkNuAIKYqDLMShmwPx5+mdjozXKlbSVVfJPhm2EV0 wMreeyKaGCgrujJAnFGENu8fGL4pdbq1lfS3OBaWRUpetxwwpAUjAf8X8Wsrb3cvSd23 sn9D4Hph+7AuqkXGSwSy8djxpBRUL/Nq5A5w5+5PNsZff++tFBIQ7qx6v9rJh2rY+CIi kdADYUeAjpLGBGgn9lFNEmJi5kgPS3A25qmN28eWvjDg5P27L+rLj2MUZTklhUYZKAR5 z2FjyTOXhhAgqfw6eY3h9Kd/U9kMymfNn1+AKMSrcP8htnZ4ibpXjpiC6TFQmwjKbUxm q4Hw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=KZ9vpqueou0IwLq5Di7NI/CPheOB7X8DdZiyYr4PdG4=; b=jHPbCE6zt5nihdRUcKlPjerzTwNijP0bJBYxBn4+8BvziSv2+QtDNuRmQ5lmCc9o4Q OhrirlkLYjxOsFzSqXbj/pDpZag8OkdwLBDh7lWKhTltal4ZuTjsr2KpRJQBzRj+VX2O Bz3FlVSy2u7vs7wY8tH9NLN/FI9JaTfTJbWcl/GKNQhUiUfrplGHxMSr/4qcqmeJVyZh TuZTcTFiRZup1zaCeLgb0TDqdYUx94Tbv3Fajadf6nQrncTzha4CjUVl2r54Ce8R+Rkj J0m9kT9pp4nry1okFHueUgd9gmiqi2dZrGW+oBCumMaZNgkmnJs+duq1ULsoV3WjljJt B2vg== X-Received: by 10.182.158.42 with SMTP id wr10mr99056obb.15.1398451996582; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:53:16 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.29.227 with SMTP id n3ls826080obh.57.gmail; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:53:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.44.233 with SMTP id h9mr1427obm.41.1398451995060; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:53:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:53:14 -0700 (PDT) From: ".neit." To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Cc: ".neit." , lurifax@gmail.com Message-Id: <4f52fef2-d9b1-4a8d-80c0-e2557457238d@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <700717d1-6c0c-4b4c-a6d2-77d5401f0db5@googlegroups.com> <53579EDF.3010308@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] how do you use sumka'i to refer to an outer bridi? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kosmikconundrum@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_36_26252888.1398451994482" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 8385 ------=_Part_36_26252888.1398451994482 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable doi dan. =20 I know you didn't intend to lure me. I purposefully misinterpreted your=20 statement as though you had meant to make me feel ok with usage that not=20 everyone agrees with. In light of that willful misinterpretation, your=20 suggestion to "use it responsibly" could likewise be misinterpreted as=20 permission for me to go off and use said contentous usage. By asking if=20 this was a hazing, I implied that you did all of this to play a joke on me= =20 for the purpose of initiating the new-guy. =20 =20 You did, in fact, take plenty of precautions. I noticed, and jokingly=20 pretended otherwise. (hence the {zo'o / zo'onai} discursives. Did I use= =20 them correctly?)=20 =20 That explains all the content under my {zo'o} that could possibly offend. = =20 And I apologize if I did offend you. If there is any of the rest of my=20 mail under the {zo'onai} that you didn't uderstand, I'll happily explain it= =20 as well! =20 As for {ka} vs {nu} being a question of semantics rather than grammer. I= =20 agree. I haven't decided what I believe regarding the semantic question,= =20 and so I haven't decided which convention of usage I want to use as a=20 general rule. Since I'm undecided, I'll stick with what's published {nu}. = =20 That's what I've learned on thus far, and so it's what I'm currently=20 comfortable with. I admit, that as I use Lojban more and become more=20 comfortable with it (as you and others have in IRC), then I'll likely use= =20 what's popular {ka}. =20 =20 And thanks by the way for all the links you provided on my other post! I= =20 feel like I've crawled all over that website (lojban.org) and yet somehow= =20 missed those pages! =20 Most helpful indeed! =20 mi'e neit. mu'o =20 On Friday, April 25, 2014 1:47:02 PM UTC-4, Dan Ros=C3=A9n wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 7:26 PM, .neit. > > wrote: > >> zo'o Oh, I see how it is Dan. Lure in the noob with the phrase "quite= =20 >> customary", strap a controversy to his back when he isn't looking, and s= et=20 >> him loose on the board! What is this a hazing? .u'isai >> > > It wasn't my intention to lure anyone. I thought "quite customary" and=20 > "not everyone agrees with this" was precautionary enough. I don't=20 > understand the rest of your mail. > =20 > >> ... Especially when the grammer is already decided. >> > =20 >> > About English, I feel that it's ok if you break the rules of grammer and= =20 >> convention, as long as you know the grammer and convention, and you brea= k=20 >> it on purpose, to create an effect. >> > > This is not a question about grammar (after all, {ka} and {nu} are in the= =20 > same selma'o/part-of-speech). It is a question of semantics. > > co'o > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_36_26252888.1398451994482 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
doi dan.
 
I know you didn't intend to lure me.  I purposefully misinterpret= ed your statement as though you had meant to make me feel ok with usage tha= t not everyone agrees with.  In light of that willful misinterpretatio= n, your suggestion to "use it responsibly" could likewise be misinterpreted= as permission for me to go off and use said contentous usage.  By ask= ing if this was a hazing, I implied that you did all of this to play a joke= on me for the purpose of initiating the new-guy. 
 
You did, in fact, take plenty of precautions.  I noticed, and jok= ingly pretended otherwise.  (hence the {zo'o / zo'onai} discursives.&n= bsp; Did I use them correctly?) 
 
That explains all the content under my {zo'o} that could possibly offe= nd.  And I apologize if I did offend you.  If there is any of the= rest of my mail under the {zo'onai} that you didn't uderstand, I'll happil= y explain it as well!
 
As for {ka} vs {nu} being a question of semantics rather than grammer.=   I agree.  I haven't decided what I believe regarding the semant= ic question, and so I haven't decided which convention of usage I want to u= se as a general rule.  Since I'm undecided, I'll stick with what's pub= lished {nu}.  That's what I've learned on thus far, and so it's what I= 'm currently comfortable with.  I admit, that as I use Lojban more and= become more comfortable with it (as you and others have in IRC), then I'll= likely use what's popular {ka}. 
 
And thanks by the way for all the links you provided on my other post!=   I feel like I've crawled all over that website (lojban.org) and yet = somehow missed those pages!
 
Most helpful indeed!
 
mi'e neit. mu'o
 
On Friday, April 25, 2014 1:47:02 PM UTC-4, Dan Ros=C3=A9n wrote:

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 7:26 PM, .neit. <kosmikc...@gmail.com><= /SPAN> wrote:
zo'o Oh, I see how it is Dan.  Lure in the noob with the phrase "= quite customary", strap a controversy to his back when he isn't looking, an= d set him loose on the board!  What is this a hazing?  .u'isai

It wasn't my intention to lure anyone. I thought "quite customary"= and "not everyone agrees with this" was precautionary enough. I don't unde= rstand the rest of your mail.
 
... Especially when the grammer is already decided.
 
About English, I feel that it's ok if you break the rules of grammer a= nd convention, as long as you know the grammer and convention, and you brea= k it on purpose, to create an effect.

This is not a question about grammar (after all, {ka} and {nu} are= in the same selma'o/part-of-speech). It is a question of semantics.
co'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lo= jban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_36_26252888.1398451994482--