Received: from mail-ee0-f59.google.com ([74.125.83.59]:51377) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XUdDE-00059h-5G for lojban-beginners-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:01:37 -0700 Received: by mail-ee0-f59.google.com with SMTP id c41sf115913eek.4 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:01:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=jTGsDxYD67JKaAj9BA5RMrQcjuQNCEjbggQtspa74T0=; b=YiEHgPh1Bhku9TekYepIK5Hl06AZ5nDHyx39fjUsY0kiqZ38MJxkRnIsdNgLtMHN07 NvbysqcrSFN0UGeMKUKdeeMb8eNpDzS/dA46QZ1scw8+cwj2qWTOxum8p8NMnonYcEwC dv1jj89eNHuXtLMrMhDNgHRuAfDUxAhZ0q70Q8saqv4Y4TsQKVECAMYZau4kgz1i8f1I 5NrBKox7LIql2yPsVdLvwuKXXsh/Y+p4eSrj6/wPb3G62YXsoXYttgAfw4y7F8gRn/Mh Gnhfbqmr3lywBvKvx6gNty1gIHKQ8gZgrhr20nSMRelJDxpM0RzADTE7a7uFiD/V2tt/ X+fQ== X-Received: by 10.152.19.226 with SMTP id i2mr18590lae.5.1411052488646; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:01:28 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.27.225 with SMTP id w1ls264562lag.2.gmail; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:01:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.167.165 with SMTP id zp5mr701468lbb.9.1411052486288; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-x229.google.com (mail-lb0-x229.google.com [2a00:1450:4010:c04::229]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b6si5939lbd.1.2014.09.18.08.01.26 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c04::229; Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id b12so1332584lbj.14 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:01:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.129.228 with SMTP id nz4mr259883lbb.9.1411052486161; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.25.229 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 08:01:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:01:26 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] {bilni}. How to use? It has been use only once! From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a83ae32799b05035842b0 X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.9 X-Spam_score_int: -8 X-Spam_bar: / Content-Length: 5675 --047d7b3a83ae32799b05035842b0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Jacob Errington wrote: > I can see bilni in two ways. > > 1) bende with the x2 removed, plus the usual connotations of things being > military. (That being said, I would like to see bende2 removed, since it's > just another instance of group membership which can be achieved by other > means.) > I have a different view on "bende", I think the x2 is important, and the x3 is the one that doesn't belong. For me bende is just a special case of gunma, just like bakfu, stura, liste, cecmu and so many others. There are many gismu wih an emergent-constituents relation between x1 and x2 and I think it's a good regularity. I consider flock, herd, swarm, etc examples of "bende", and I don't think they must necessarily have a leader. If we need to talk about lo jatna be lo bende, we can say "lo jatna be lo bende", or "lo bedja'a". I don't think "bende" should be burdened with a place for a leader, because it restricts its meaning too much. 2) the definition is a bit off. Read it instead like this: "bilni = x1 is > *a* military/regimented/strongly organized x2 for purpose x3". This way, > bilni is what I call a "connotation selbri", like the cultural gismu. This > allows you to use it as a compositional adjective, like mutce et al. e.g. > bende bilni -> bilni lo ka ce'u bende -> "army". You can effectively > "militarize" any selbri by sticking "bilni" onto the end thus. > Agreed, if I had been thrown the keyword "military" to make a place structure for it I would have said "x1 is military in property/aspect x2", because that's the usual place structure for adjectives. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7b3a83ae32799b05035842b0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Jacob Errington <= ;nictytan@gmail.com= > wrote:
<= div class=3D"gmail_extra">
I can see bilni i= n two ways.

1) bende with the x2 removed, plus the usual connotation= s of things being military. (That being said, I would like to see bende2 re= moved, since it's just another instance of group membership which can b= e achieved by other means.)
I have a different view on "bende", I think the x2 i= s important, and the x3 is the one that doesn't belong. For me bende is= just a special case of gunma, just like bakfu, stura, liste, cecmu and so = many others. There are many gismu wih an emergent-constituents relation bet= ween x1 and x2 and I think it's a good regularity. I consider flock, he= rd, swarm, etc examples of "bende", and I don't think they mu= st necessarily have a leader. If we need to talk about lo jatna be lo bende= , we can say "lo jatna be lo bende", or "lo bedja'a"= ;. I don't think "bende" should be burdened with a place for = a leader, because it restricts its meaning too much.

2) the definition is a bit off. Read it inste= ad like this: "bilni =3D x1 is a military/regimented/strongly o= rganized x2 for purpose x3". This way, bilni is what I call a "co= nnotation selbri", like the cultural gismu. This allows you to use it = as a compositional adjective, like mutce et al. e.g. bende bilni -> biln= i lo ka ce'u bende -> "army". You can effectively "mi= litarize" any selbri by sticking "bilni" onto the end thus.<= br>

Agreed, if I ha= d been thrown the keyword "military" to make a place structure fo= r it I would have said "x1 is military in property/aspect x2", be= cause that's the usual place structure for adjectives.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lo= jban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7b3a83ae32799b05035842b0--