Received: from mail-qa0-f56.google.com ([209.85.216.56]:44819) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XULm7-00010W-M2 for lojban-beginners-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:24:28 -0700 Received: by mail-qa0-f56.google.com with SMTP id w8sf373471qac.11 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:24:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=GwRSDLawv8xIMmuprdL0YwEU/pa9kOXE2Og3la5IkLU=; b=JIR4isvIjN6Rixy4ANNUT3jqvqXZ1U0mnLCqp1xK+yVZzXO7lPwuVU9AT5WOxKNfND 0imvW537hCpjT7jpnefxAg9l0EN7/nBy1+09Z0TsqLPl/Ayx4t6+xcLn+Rp9m0tCqIw3 Y4N5pgpQBJJoTpuJDfhtQJSGr7X3O+WRLp1cQ7gGJPj9v1aDPsTbWBqhVrrNmmzd6LsW i6OEW7jTVHGMZ73kna3DqJbm65gg8muDZxJ6CAz7SK+lhsyamQpZYAvMP8VaHAB6b6lx mrIChZYz5HLDm8F7LjL3trL+AG4wl1e0iVSX7bNwblSCyqaWY3NaiqExJebMmoErn5cA sUKw== X-Received: by 10.50.115.74 with SMTP id jm10mr551896igb.12.1410985460973; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:24:20 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.50.233 with SMTP id f9ls1023920igo.44.gmail; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:24:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.42.13.146 with SMTP id d18mr776592ica.19.1410985459735; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:24:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-x235.google.com (mail-vc0-x235.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c03::235]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ew8si516654vdb.1.2014.09.17.13.24.19 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:24:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c03::235; Received: by mail-vc0-x235.google.com with SMTP id ij19so1811263vcb.26 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:24:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.221.23.198 with SMTP id rb6mr37761978vcb.19.1410985459590; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:24:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.67.141 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:23:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jacob Errington Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:23:59 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban-beginners] how to use {fancu}? To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11337fb01a2b79050348a7e5 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Content-Length: 5002 --001a11337fb01a2b79050348a7e5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 17 September 2014 11:23, Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas wrot= e: > > As for (2): It doesn't really make a lot of sense to me to have a place > for expression x4 in addition to a place for the function. It's as if > "klama" was defined as "x1 goes to x2 ... and has name x6". The place for > the range is also redundant. It's as if "jalge" was defined as "x1 is the > result of x2 among potential results x3", or something like that. "fancu" > ought to have just two places: "x1 is a function of x2". > In that case, I wonder what the type of the x1 could be. Is it a function in the sense of a ka abstraction? I would find this strikingly useful. Alas, that's not what you used for your example. I think I would have written it ".i lo ka makau jdima ce'u cu fancu lo ni ce'u se sabji gijo'u jai se cpedu". The major limitation here is that there's no obvious way to actually refer to the things themselves, so the place for the domain becomes useful with this formalism, since saying that this function actually applies to some concrete object would amount to stating that the object is in the domain of this function. This also gives us a neat way of saying things like "How likely I am to do something depends on how much I want to do it," as ".i lo ni lakne fa lo nu mi ce'u zukte cu fancu lo ni mi djica co zukte ce'u" all the while avoiding lo-sumti altogether, simply talking about how these functions relate. .i mi'e la tsani mu'o --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11337fb01a2b79050348a7e5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 17 September 2014 11:23, Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas <jjll= ambias@gmail.com> wrote:

As fo= r (2): It doesn't really make a lot of sense to me to have a place for = expression x4 in addition to a place for the function. It's as if "= ;klama" was defined as "x1 goes to x2 ... and has name x6". = The place for the range is also redundant. It's as if "jalge"= was defined as "x1 is the result of x2 among potential results x3&quo= t;, or something like that. "fancu" ought to have just two places= : "x1 is a function of x2".

=C2=A0In that case, I wonder what the type of the x1 could be. = Is it a function in the sense of a ka abstraction? I would find this striki= ngly useful. Alas, that's not what you used for your example. I think I= would have written it ".i lo ka makau jdima ce'u cu fancu lo ni c= e'u se sabji gijo'u jai se cpedu". The major limitation here i= s that there's no obvious way to actually refer to the things themselve= s, so the place for the domain becomes useful with this formalism, since sa= ying that this function actually applies to some concrete object would amou= nt to stating that the object is in the domain of this function.

Th= is also gives us a neat way of saying things like "How likely I am to = do something depends on how much I want to do it," as ".i lo ni l= akne fa lo nu mi ce'u zukte cu fancu lo ni mi djica co zukte ce'u&q= uot; all the while avoiding lo-sumti altogether, simply talking about how t= hese functions relate.

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o
=

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lo= jban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11337fb01a2b79050348a7e5--