Received: from mail-qc0-f186.google.com ([209.85.216.186]:47376) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0NjZ-0002hT-Te for lojban-beginners-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 20:58:18 -0800 Received: by mail-qc0-f186.google.com with SMTP id b13sf1620862qcw.13 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 20:58:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version:content-type :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=0KJMYqzUfeYySLlRwYMra3iPS/0WkwGx6ASHKmobsqQ=; b=xS4B/WdHUlM9gMQPLaIO97jxLiCyvSmRELHkbR9KcnMsqf0dLCizhJgGcqIEKtVqKg XYY7cjZ2+7VPhS3pZr6MNk+4AUvK86UOSnphfc62FNl029FObUNB7a1cDwDqln/th/Zl 9wV1XA3SJ4QW7fCj4+z5BeotliL8hTqNnh1oBavkxjgU2C8BOLAqhjkIzRTMCzQwMUcp DDD+2ysdgl1eAtNj4m3QCtP7c+u9Lo+W5TihBrpJBE2PKDCJemv7H9XUq2N2RRH8y+SW XE02gmYxvpt/9Qd1BWnnWeKlzSKR5nzcubpawZwndLvFiTScuR8c4B0ndB/321USZP6f uUOA== X-Received: by 10.140.27.197 with SMTP id 63mr129906qgx.6.1418619487121; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 20:58:07 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.81.149 with SMTP id f21ls2455028qgd.73.gmail; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 20:58:06 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.95.182 with SMTP id i51mr3902qge.12.1418619486363; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 20:58:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 20:58:04 -0800 (PST) From: ravas To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-Id: Subject: [lojban-beginners] Give us a moment, please. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_554_27846014.1418619484716" X-Original-Sender: ravas@outlook.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Content-Length: 3136 ------=_Part_554_27846014.1418619484716 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_555_2004005899.1418619484716" ------=_Part_555_2004005899.1418619484716 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 "Give us a moment, please." I found this sentence here: http://tatoeba.org/eng/sentences/show/2645083 It had a lojban translation: {ko tu'a mi ze'i denpa} Obviously the English sentence is an idiom, which we won't translate directly. However, is the aforementioned lojban coherent? I think {e'o do ze'i denpa} would work. Another translation could be {e'o do ze'i xrukla vi}. I also thought of: {e'o mi'a ze'i djica lo nu sivtavla} [Request] We [for a short time period] want to privately talk. Curiously camxes.lojban.org/ (awesome) claims this is not grammatically correct. Yet it has no problem with: {e'o mi'a ze'i djica lo nu sivni tavla} Is {sivtavla} incorrect? Or have I discovered a bug? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_555_2004005899.1418619484716 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"Give us a moment, please."
I found this sentence here:=
http://tatoeba.org/eng/sentences/show/2645083
It had a lojban trans= lation:
{ko tu'a mi ze'i denpa}

Obviously the English sentence is= an idiom,
which we won't translate directly.
However, is the aforeme= ntioned lojban coherent?

I think {e'o do ze'i denpa} would work.
=
Another translation could be {e'o do ze'i xrukla vi}.

I also tho= ught of:
{e'o mi'a ze'i djica lo nu sivtavla}
[Request] We [for a sho= rt time period] want to privately talk.

Curiously
camxes.lojban.o= rg/ (awesome)
claims this is not grammatically correct.
Yet it has no= problem with:
{e'o mi'a ze'i djica lo nu sivni tavla}

Is {sivtav= la} incorrect? Or have I discovered a bug?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lo= jban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_555_2004005899.1418619484716-- ------=_Part_554_27846014.1418619484716--