Received: from mail-qa0-f62.google.com ([209.85.216.62]:62247) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XwH3H-0004OG-3x for lojban-beginners-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:01:37 -0800 Received: by mail-qa0-f62.google.com with SMTP id w8sf2330238qac.27 for ; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:01:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=yG5Jy6lXrFE43ypuFoWHJzJnlqT9QG7utOO37jyQzJ0=; b=Q+PZ6lpyqkMlKcCIQLn50PRO73n0N9GSgUOJhNXmGSRRXGFEg3f48ozsBmhugH8iuZ nduv0S/x521/66XxyvaHn5XrZKQO3DiPQlUkCN53AUPniPSPBr1UI88D348A5jkcwPn9 Xidp2UGPYMA/5K5uJBu95o0LZPLv6ucfBqYvrFP9ry3UqUmQujE4vC8PhSvfsl+0u5zb MUN2v/nzCZu7ctuhMI13YcgvzTNdzioYpT2swtnnXJiPECvLV2pX0TifAZJU2crFntTa XQ/LCMydKjkWJaiksqm1IXNIyihmC9u5FIhkxfwy5wzlfLaGY5DgO0TwCU8TKOQP93jF eK/w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=yG5Jy6lXrFE43ypuFoWHJzJnlqT9QG7utOO37jyQzJ0=; b=AY2LN+L8SWwRvS2/t8Ut7PdfEtROoKMrDcEebwbzYvDle2tndShgxa+/2S5NZmGYyL vcOsYfmLKkpudu/0haWz02eEPmfkM9QvqfycbImJAER6QlE2vrYwNUNKX87ZrO2tHvsm LdbZtFj32Xd5jzzKHJ1gPEqpgyAL79Dyll7vtTGE22gnBDqrt12TZByKBWvKL6Jxrz3g MqD+fciEBeLB79Lx9TnlBeukCfSetGanjBOYqgsoO6yVoNClyP4NwFbpYy5VdR2teatv V6platccCozi0aVZrawzKzHyQm5AnTY7ago0WPP0fb7kmH8yWT0LNy2zNjMpaGuMoJQO 5NeQ== X-Received: by 10.140.32.74 with SMTP id g68mr37553qgg.22.1417640489141; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:01:29 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.85.148 with SMTP id n20ls802875qgd.78.gmail; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:01:28 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.91.35 with SMTP id y32mr37150qgd.25.1417640488345; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:01:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 13:01:26 -0800 (PST) From: la durka To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: White men can't jump. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_263_361853742.1417640487850" X-Original-Sender: durka42@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-beginners+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 300742228892 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Content-Length: 5754 ------=_Part_263_361853742.1417640487850 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_264_2153490.1417640487850" ------=_Part_264_2153490.1417640487850 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El martes, 2 de diciembre de 2014 21:51:12 UTC-5, ra...@outlook.com=20 escribi=C3=B3: > > White men can't jump. > lo kapli nakni cu na kakne lo nu plipe > This one looks good, though in modern usage {kakne} is usually used with=20 {ka} instead of {nu}: {lo kapli nakni cu na kakne lo ka [ce'u] plipe}.=20 > lo kapli nakni na ka'e plipe=20 > > I can't jump; possibly because I am a white man. > mi na kakne lo nu plipe ki'u da'i mi lo kapli nakni > First, {ki'u} takes one sumti (an abstraction), so the clause should be=20 {ki'u da'i lo nu mi kapli nakni}. *mi na kakne lo ka plipe ki'u da'i lo nu mi kapli nakni* However, note that {nu} abstractions encapsulate an entire bridi, so to get= =20 the {ki'u} outside of the abstraction, where it belongs, you need to=20 terminate the abstraction with {kei} (or {ku}, or {vau}). *mi na kakne lo ka plipe kei ki'u da'i lo nu mi kapli nakni* However (again), that leaves a subtle problem with scope. {na} scopes over= =20 the {ki'u} clause, so this says "It's not true that (I can jump because I'm= =20 a white man)", i.e. "Being a white man is not the reason that I can jump".= =20 It should be flipped to get the correct scoping, as in {ki'u da'i lo nu mi= =20 kapli nakni kei mi na kakne lo ka plipe}, or you can split it into two=20 jufra as {mi na kakne lo ka plipe .i da'i lo nu mi kapli nakni cu krinu [lo= =20 du'u go'i]}. (Sorry. Negation can make things complicated.) > > Are these translations correct? > xu le xe fanva drani=20 > > In the second sentence I want to indicate that I don't actually know why = I=20 > am unable to jump;=20 > however, it could be because I'm a white man. > > ki'e > je'e mu'o mi'e la durkavore =20 --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_264_2153490.1417640487850 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


El martes, 2 de diciembre de 2014 21:51:12 UTC-5, = ra...@outlook.com escribi=C3=B3:
White men can't jump.
lo kapli nakni cu na kakne lo n= u plipe
This one looks good, though in modern us= age {kakne} is usually used with {ka} instead of {nu}: {lo kapli nakni cu n= a kakne lo ka [ce'u] plipe}.
lo kapli nakni na ka'e plipe

I can't jump; poss= ibly because I am a white man.
mi na kakne lo nu plipe ki'u da'i mi lo k= apli nakni
First, {ki'u} takes one sumti (an abs= traction), so the clause should be {ki'u da'i lo nu mi kapli nakni}.
= mi na kakne lo ka plipe ki'u da'i lo nu mi kapli nakni
However, note that {nu} abstractions encapsulate an entire bridi, so to get the=20 {ki'u} outside of the abstraction, where it belongs, you need to=20 terminate the abstraction with {kei} (or {ku}, or {vau}).
mi na kakne= lo ka plipe kei ki'u da'i lo nu mi kapli nakni
However (again), tha= t leaves a subtle problem with scope. {na} scopes over the {ki'u} clause, s= o this says "It's not true that (I can jump because I'm a white man)", i.e.= "Being a white man is not the reason that I can jump". It should be flippe= d to get the correct scoping, as in {ki'u da'i lo nu mi kapli nakni kei mi = na kakne lo ka plipe}, or you can split it into two jufra as {mi na kakne l= o ka plipe .i da'i lo nu mi kapli nakni cu krinu [lo du'u go'i]}.
(Sorry= . Negation can make things complicated.)

Are these translations correct?xu le xe fanva drani

In the second sentence I want to indicate tha= t I don't actually know why I am unable to jump;
however, it could be b= ecause I'm a white man.

ki'e

je'e mu'= o mi'e la durkavore
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lo= jban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_264_2153490.1417640487850-- ------=_Part_263_361853742.1417640487850--