Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 19 Aug 2004 02:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fysh.org
	([83.170.75.51] helo=bowl.fysh.org ident=mail)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24)
	(Exim 4.34)
	id 1BxjA0-0005fv-0z
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 02:24:41 -0700
Received: from zefram by bowl.fysh.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Bxj9j-0003Ww-00
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:24:23 +0100
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:24:23 +0100
From: Zefram <zefram@fysh.org>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: samselpli ?
Message-ID: <20040819092423.GB3076@fysh.org>
References: <20040817235553.GZ3538@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040818084944.GB24841@fysh.org> <20040818191959.GG13226@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040818191959.GG13226@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-archive-position: 8500
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: zefram@fysh.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list
Content-Length: 286

In building lujvo, is it required that "samselpli" and "sampli" express
the same relationship (but with permuted places), in the manner that
"selpli" and "pilno" express the same relationship?  Currently we have
"samselpli" and "sampli" defined with different sets of places.

-zefram