Re: [bpfk] The Case for UI.

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:58:06PM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Robin Lee Powell <
> rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> >

> > There's no need to have a new set of words; just an irrealis
> > marker, i.e. {da'i}.
>
>

> I'm going to agree with Robin on this.
>
> Also, did you mean {da'oi}, the cmavo .stelas. created, or did you
> really mean {da'i} - "supposing"?

I really meant {da'i}; creating subjunctives is what that's *for*.

-Robin

Just making sure it wasn't a typo, since {da'oi} is also relative to this discussion.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.