On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:38:47AM -0700, Theodore Reed wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 00:19, Robin Lee Powell <
rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
> > wrote:
>
> >
> > OK, so. The urge to just Go Fix Shit has been growing in me. I
> > think there's actually not all that much to do if I can get people
> > in a room for concentrated time to work on it.
> >
> > So, here's what's going to happen.
> >
> > 1. Lindar is working on examples, basic cleanup, and search of past
> > contention for everything.
> >
> > 2. I have diffs for the CLL; I will go through them, possibly with
> > others, and approve the result as the new CLL.
> >
> > 3. Possibly in parallel, somebody converts the current CLL in git
> > to docbook.
> >
> > 4. I, some other bay area Lojbanists, and a *very* few people via
> > voice chat, sit down for serious, concentrated sessions of Fixing
> > Shit. The results I want here look, in my head, a lot like what Bob
> > originally asked for, actually. To wit:
> >
> > - a series of numbered alternative proposals; there might be three
> > {ni} proposals, for example. Somewhere (I'm thinking in a setup
> > like
shapado.com, but suggestions *very* welcome here) is a
> > repository of the proposals *and the justifications for each
> > option*. Each proposal is associated with CLL changes and word
> > definitons.
>
> We could do these as branches in git, maybe?