Re: [bpfk] Alternatives to {bo} in {i ... bo}?

[Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>]

2015-07-07 7:37 GMT+03:00 Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>:

Two bridi can be connected by {i SUMTCITA bo}. {bo} has two effects: it
prevents an immediately following sumti from being taken as the object of the
preposition, and it groups the bridi more tightly and right-associatively than
surrounding bridi connected by just {i}. One may want left-association:

lo filso cu lacpu lo mamta bakni lo carce .icabo lo cifybakni cu pinfu
.itezu'ebo facki lo jei la .iaves. kau gasnu lo nunbilma

(This is an abbreviated version of 1 Samuel 6:7-9.) Is there a way to connect
three or more bridi with prepositions without forcing right association?

Won't {iJA TAG bo} fix the problem?

Or by not using {i TAG bo} at all, fix the scope by moving the prepositional phrases to the right and join them using {ce'e} or {e}.

 

Pierre
--
li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.