[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] Re: Internal grammar of UI, NAI and CAI

Yes I definitely agree. However it's sometimes useful to override the default grouping, especially with an explicit internal grammar like this. But I'm fine leaving toi'e/toi'o to wallow in experimental-land for a while longer :)


On July 22, 2015 at 9:38:35 AM, Gleki Arxokuna (gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com) wrote:


2015-07-22 10:24 GMT+03:00 Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>:
Also, I would be happy if we added toi'e/toi'o or a similar mechanism.

I don't see why we need them. UI are primitives, no need to clone the whole grammar of Lojban using attitudinals.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.