On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com> wrote:Agreed, the biggest question for me (beyond whether this is a good idea at all, zo'o zo'o nai) is what changes would be made to the grammar of LI?None. It only affects "number" and "lerfu-string" directly. li-clause remains the same:li-clause <- LI-clause free* mex LOhO-clause? free*Would it be able to take a pure-lerfu string, a pure-digit string, but not a mixture?Among other things, yes. It still takes any mex.Or would we leave LI alone but create two new gadri selma'o that take pure-lerfu and pure-digit, respectively?We leave LI alone and we don't create anything new.mu'o mi'e xorxes
--You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.