[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] Another (minor) bug in the PEG morphology

To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] Another (minor) bug in the PEG morphology
From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 22:17:00 -0300
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=WF8YDApOOR9FBC9mojsZYnM9IY85X3S5jAmgdVHTmDQ=; b=vRXTm85i/nGWN3y+FEcwufelCPGYnXfuOydL+CoOu8n5deajkdyD47vA91TnKzRO0r q4E4a3ojYBQrcSYMsDXqJwsUTO+TKUbTv4uXuqiWoq7ZbEVgNdQzzD1ogYYH/3dWX7pp P74TY49irlFkw/PM7zy8G7oq0+tc0R5fq/ZMNFChgd+KXMznGGeBUsGmbhT2PmaTy4q2 fEeXsNCPQK4xDCERYmWgIwCiA/n0OfC2MCwbuV70rnmsHbZPygxV2zFQo5/jJg9QfHPY 3g2tFApjmpJQoY2ksWnhtFQhMiY0WKBi/iFExS1Ntv9d8cJGB3E7Yc1gAkMTe7jUfHvM kPDA==
In-reply-to: <CAMOGbhtiEh5HkQK+R4qrsz2ATO976swRYniWFWJ-U4LGU0+gBg@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-lis>
List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-id: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>, <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
References: <CAO7tK2edBGwqtJa-mnP4n2x0Hab-+f8b8uAnHSuvKxWYGSYFTA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMOGbhtiEh5HkQK+R4qrsz2ATO976swRYniWFWJ-U4LGU0+gBg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com

On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com> wrote:

Heh, I had noticed this problem when playing with fu'ivla rafsi, but I just assumed I didn't understand how to use them correctly!

In fact spageTI''ypre parses ok, so it's the detection of the stress by syllable count which is failing.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [bpfk] Another (minor) bug in the PEG morphology
  - From: Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>

References:
- [bpfk] Another (minor) bug in the PEG morphology
  - From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Re: [bpfk] Another (minor) bug in the PEG morphology
  - From: Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [bpfk] Another (minor) bug in the PEG morphology
Next by Date: Re: [bpfk] Another (minor) bug in the PEG morphology
Previous by thread: Re: [bpfk] Another (minor) bug in the PEG morphology
Next by thread: Re: [bpfk] Another (minor) bug in the PEG morphology
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread