[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] camxes and syllabification in zi'evla



On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com> wrote:

valsrmu'erskepre: val-sr-mu-'er-SKE-pr-e
mu'erskepres: mu-'er-ske-pres

The advantage of lujvo=>zi'evla is that you see where camxes thinks the stress is -- but I didn't expect that consonantal_syllable "pr". Is that really how you would pronounce that zi'evla? How many syllables does it have?

That'a bug in the morphology, well found! I've changed the consonantal-syllable rule to:

  consonantal-syllable <- consonant syllabic !nucleus (consonant &spaces)?

Hopefully that should fix it.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.