Re: [bpfk] Can we drop the fore tanru cmavo?

[John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>]

Jorge Llambías scripsit:

> Not necessarily: "broda ga ... zei da" [...]
> Not always: "broda gu'a ... bu". [...]
> And when you hear PA after a selbri, you don't know whether the selbri
> is complete (broda PA brode) or whether there is more to come (broda
> PA mei).

Well, yes, but zei, bu, mei are handled by the pre-YACC portion of the
official parser, so they aren't going to be easy to understand in complex
cases.  (In hindsight, we should have made MEI a prefix as gua\spi does.)

-- 
No,  John.  I want formats that are actually       John Cowan
useful, rather than over-featured megaliths that   http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
address all questions by piling on ridiculous      cowan@ccil.org
internal links in forms which are hideously
over-complex. --Simon St. Laurent on xml-dev

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.