[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] Does Lojban PEG need a "naughty OR" operator?


On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

E.g. I proposed adding " / COhE_elidible" where COhE_elidible returns a " { ... } " _expression_.

Currently your rule is called GOhA_elidible, but I think that's the wrong name for what it does, it should be "selbri_elided", since it replaces "selbri", not "GOhA", and the rule succeeds only when the selbri is in fact elidED. The _elidIBLE rules succeed both when the construct is elided and when not elided. 

A GOhA_elidible rule would have to replace GOhA_clause (although that would allow many more perhaps not desirable things to be grammatical).

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.