Re: [bpfk] te sumti detection using PEG

[Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>]

2015-04-08 18:30 GMT+03:00 Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>:

2015-04-08 18:15 GMT+03:00 Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>:

doesn't interact with ...GIhE...

This is also limited to my level of familiarity with the grammar. When I understand it more I will come them too.

Currently it deals with simple giheks like this:
mi klama do lo cmana gi'e cliva gi'e pinxe lo ladru vau lo kabri =>

([FAXIPA mi] [CU {klama <FAXIRE do> <FAXICI (¹lo cmana KU¹)> VAU}] [gi'e {CU <cliva VAU>} VAU] [gi'e {CU <pinxe (¹FAXIRE [lo ladru KU]¹) vau>} {FA <lo kabri KU>} VAU]) 

As you can see it fails to determine the place of {lo kabri}. Indeed, how is it supposed to be marked since {lo kabri} here is klama4, cliva2 and pinxe3 ?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.