[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] tagged termsets



On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com> wrote:
I apologize if I'm bringing up a sore subject that's been discussed before.

I don't remember this being discussed before.
 
But I found a parsing difference between jbofi'e and camxes:

Text in question: {bai nu'i ge da gi de}, i.e. a forethought termset inside (or so I thought) a modal tag

jbofi'e output: (0[{bai <nu'i (1[ge da gi de] NU'U)1>} VAU])0
camxes output: ([{bai KU} {nu'i ge da NUhU gi de NUhU}] VAU)

Clearly a bug in jbofi'e. A termset is a set (sequence) of terms, and terms are already tagged, they cannot be tagged a second time. 
 
Apparently, jbofi'e regards the termset as inside the modal, while camxes doesn't. This seems quite significant, since if I added a selbri {bai nu'i ge da gi de broda}, the x1 of broda is either {zo'e} or {da}+{de}, depending on whether the termset is encapsulated by the modal or not.

YACC/EBNF grammar agrees with camxes. 

Is this a known parsing difference? Is it related to gek-termsets? Do I simply still not understand termsets?

I don't think it's related to gek-termsets, no.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.