|
On 07/04/2015 08:21, Gleki Arxokuna
wrote:
abs_term = "absorbable term", "term that becomes a selbritcita when followed by a selbri". I implemented this absorbable/non-absorbable term grammar split in order to implement the standard behavior of selbritcita as per Jbofihe; that is, {lo nu brodo ba brode} parses as {lo nu brodo ba CU brode} in the standard version of Camxes; however, {mi ba brode gi'e pu brodo} parses as {mi CU ba brode gi'e pu brodo}, so the behavior of "ba" varies depending on its environment: if "ba" is within a bridi-tail, it is non-absorbable (it cannot become a selbritcita), but if it is in a bridi-head, it is absorbable as a selbritcita. In the experimental grammar (Camxes-exp), an alternative behavior is implemented: "ba" would become a selbritcita even in the case of {lo nu brodo ba brode} (so this sentence parses as {lo nu brodo CU ba brode} under Camxes-exp.). I know this tag grammar split is rather ugly, but at this time I hadn't been able to find a better solution. Any alternative implementation is welcomed. mi'e la .ilmen. mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |