[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bpfk] One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG

To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG
From: cowan@ccil.org
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 15:04:10 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:importance:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=ZP4IHGB1Ku9/QfTVV7kS/ReRQ1Qvi5IWhkBewkQl7IA=; b=ATQG9+VUdeQ1GCeNkrMgk2MAavNjIYgdqV4JAWpKHRvqdaKBploZZdfOh3iqE2I87B KYnVMX7j/rd0Rs5rnaf5qXTFYCBxsSK3m2wrz4z32QuuClgSad/Iuyz4/OjTAXOGzaj+ 6LorJqd/8UMHKvFqkgiRxlqv1yIMDEQKiNUI8DkvxOguZU3HyL/TqA/MuFPUHMDfvNyu WEkPPs/1XTzN67uGQvw07w9l/DfGO4dXluo/aZpPWCFD4hL8yxFNs432luchwOvzLh31 81I7le8UKlU5u93n1ivEGFx95xLjUgqig8T4ImQd9XTZ5O9CnEKrKBuyMICnQPBjyoMW wDXw==
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <1A2E049F0CB84036907C6CAAE5923EE9@gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-lis>
List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-id: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>, <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
References: <CAO7bV+jjDyC7fCn5NO-h_zL_zfFmHgB5Nwp-ec5txQzs3P3fVg@mail.gmail.com> <1A2E049F0CB84036907C6CAAE5923EE9@gmail.com>
Reply-to: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21

Alex Burka scripsit:


> Can you make a more concrete example? What specific "actions"
> differ depending on whether a term contains FA or BAI?

Terms can have FA or tags equally well, but we don't want to merge
FA with BAI generally, to avoid things like "se fa" and ".i fa bo",
which are nonsense.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
If I have seen farther than others, it is because I am surrounded by dwarves.
        --Murray Gell-Mann


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

References:
- [bpfk] One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG
  - From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
- Re: [bpfk] One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG
  - From: Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [bpfk] One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG
Next by Date: [bpfk] FA as a TAG (Was: One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG)
Previous by thread: Re: [bpfk] One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG
Next by thread: Re: [bpfk] One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread