Re: [bpfk] official cmavo form

[Alex Burka <aburka@seas.upenn.edu>]

Only within cmevla, right? Otherwise you'd be able to write "tuitsku" and get two words.

On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Jorge Llambías wrote:

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:08 AM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com> wrote:

I suggest that <tuitr, nitcion, pier, buenosaires> be deemed, by a general rule that I am not competent to formulate, orthographic variants of <tuuitr, nitciion, piier, buuenosaires> .

The rule would be simple: CiiV <-> CiV; CuuV <-> CuV.

One could also require for aesthetic reasons that the ii or uu be within a single word, although this is not strictly necessary from the point of view of unambiguity.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.