Re: [bpfk] pi PA broda

Subject: Re: [bpfk] pi PA broda

From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 19:54:22 -0300

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=sr22li3DYpsaekyMeD/tnvwkLfKcAaQunoKr4vNmx8E=; b=JqH5kt0XP/w54QEwLL8rUzTIEnq3CPWInCO5+9S9HsLkdHLohhnLXRxq1d/OeH4SOi oAFWDzVxmzsLNzKrGcBJtxYlxwD8g4eUfKB+KP9xeqQHsb892v+VYld45uGk5IKO0QKW HodBKPW8PXa3HvUdTDVRzsUAM/SeCiK7YzmGYUF/tx2Gea+KuiUzcHnTz3zXgsoImByz kWxwemm56sDslR8W6jeXuQDKAfbMbA/7Dk7qcwLuJ+wAozDIRPr+I4WWlOe1285W8Zjd NJ/IiEiQHvVPfg4I6Iw3MDsen+W2Kx6ShfsO2oJtCB6hpPFNSVp40vphFgp2n10gzTDL o8PA==

In-reply-to: <65681E0F06A2403AAC6713EF4CDA8A70@gmail.com>

List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list>

List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>

List-id: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>

List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>

List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>

List-unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>

Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com

References: <65681E0F06A2403AAC6713EF4CDA8A70@gmail.com>

Reply-to: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com

Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com> wrote:

Some irci prenu noticed that a definition for {pi PA broda} is missing from http://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=BPFK_Section:_gadri#Formal_definitions (tiki link is analogous). We (Ilmen) assumed it is supposed to say

piPA broda = lo piPA si'e be pa da poi broda

but we didn't want to change it without asking someone.

I'm not sure the definition given there for "pi PA /sumti/" is correct. In fact I'm quite certain I would not interpret "pi ro mi'o" as proposed there for example. These definitions don't really belong in this page anyway, which is about gadri, not about quantifiers.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

bpfk-list@googlegroups.com

http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list

https://groups.google.com/d/optout

Follow-Ups:

Re: [bpfk] pi PA broda
- From: Alex Burka <aburka@seas.upenn.edu>

References:

[bpfk] pi PA broda
- From: Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>