[bpfk] extended rafsi and a tosmabru/slinku'i boondoggle

[Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>]

This word came up on IRC today:

?{.esporte'yske}

(Assume for the sake of argument that the extended rafsi stress fix, noted recently by la xorxes, has been applied.)

Now, camxes says this is a tosmabru: *{.e sporte'yske}. Note that {sporte'yske} by itself _does_ parse. It is a lujvo formed from *{sporte} and {saske}. But *{sporte} is a slinku'i! So how can it show up in a lujvo?

Is this a limitation of extended rafsi (we can't really make a lujvo including a fu'ivla whose first consonant cluster is a valid initial cluster, or something along those lines), or is it a bug in the grammar?

mu'o mi'e la durkavore

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.